Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   News 2   Supported 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

'Good War?' -- or War for Narcocracy?

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Mumia Abu-Jamal  Posted by Hans Bennett (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (1 fan)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

[col. writ. 10/11/08]  (c) '08 Mumia Abu-Jamal

For many liberals, and certainly neo cons, while the Iraq War may be problematic, the war on Afghanistan was seen as 'the good war', for it could be more easily justified in light of the origins of 9/11.

After all, didn't Afghanistan host the Al Qaeda group which struck the twin towers and the Pentagon?

But the war and occupation of Afghanistan led almost inevitably to the Iraq war and occupation, for the war in Afghanistan seemed a cakewalk, so why not Iraq?

What a difference a few years makes, huh?

Now, the Taliban is making a comeback, especially in the rural hinterlands outside of Kabul.

And the poppy plant, the source of opium and heroin, which was outlawed under the strict Taliban, is now Afghanistan's chief export. Indeed, 95% of the world's heroin supply comes from Afghanistan.  And despite most news reports which blames the Taliban for the drug explosion, there is no shortage of drug dealers at the highest levels of the government of Hamid Karzai.  Indeed, a recent report from the New York Times claims that one of the biggest drug merchants in Afghanistan is named Ahmed Wali Karzai -- the brother of the president.

One of the people who informed on him was Habibullah Jan, a member of Parliament, who spoke openly on the floor of the national legislature of Karzai's drug trafficking.  Jan was later ambushed and assassinated while en route to his home in Kandahar.  Another informant told U.S. drug officials that such involvement was "no secret."  Hajji Aman Kheri said, "A lot of people in the Afghan government are involved in drug trafficking."

Here's the point.  In a matter of days, less than a month, a president will be elected (presumably Barack Obama) who will shift troops from Iraq to Afghanistan.

In essence, we will see U.S. (and NATO) troops fight for a puppet government that is mired in corruption and thick as thieves in the drug business.

President Karzai's brief does not run beyond Kabul. He is a puppet in a nation that has never abided puppets.  He fears his own people so much that he has a ring of Americans as armed bodyguards.  Some of the biggest drug dealers in the country also serve in government ministries.

This is not even a pretense of a war for democracy -- it's a war for narcocracy.

This is proof of an empire on the wane.

--(c) '08 maj

[Source: Risen, James, "Reports Link Karzai's Brother to Afghanistan Heroin Trade," New York Times, (Sun.), Oct.5, 2008, p.1-16.)

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

When the Taliban were in control by Stanimal on Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:53:01 PM
This is deep, because.... by Hans Bennett on Saturday, Oct 18, 2008 at 10:54:47 PM
about Afghanistan by io on Monday, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:21:58 AM