If george bush is such a great
leader, why did we have to go into this war, basically by ourselves.
A great leader, wouldn't have fudged the information. A
great leader wouldn't have needed to. A great leader,
if he did feel that ousting Saddam was something that needed to be
done, would have gone to the UN told the truth, explained the living
conditions of the people of Iraq and tried his level best to get the
support of the entire United Nations. A great leader would have
taken his time, planned out his war and his peace. A great
leader would have had united support and enough troops to eradicate
out any hostile invaders in Iraq. A great leader would have had
a plan and the support to see that plan through.
If george bush is such a great
leader, why aren't other countries helping us with the reconstruction
of Iraq. A great leader would have gone to the UN, explained the
problems he has run into in this "winning the peace" time of
the war. A great leader would have shown pictures of what was
done, what is being done, and what needs to be done. A great
leader would have explained to the UN that the country was in bad
shape due to the years of the sanctions and the carelessness of
Saddam. A great leader would have said something like, "I
understand that you were against the US entering into this war and I
appreciate your disagreement. I am not here to ask for help for
the United States, I am here to ask for help for the people of Iraq.
They have had to suffer through so much and now they deserve to live
their lives again. I am here to ask you if you will help us help
those people." A great leader would not have gone to
the UN at a time like this and told the members that they should
crack down on sexual slave trade. A great leader knows when to
give, when to cooperate, when to concede error and a great leader
knows diplomacy.
If george bush is such a great
leader why does he not have an exit strategy that he could share with
us? A great leader would never commit this country to war
without having a plan to end the war and bring home the troops.
A great leader would not allow the American people to bear this
enormous financial burden alone. A great leader would put the
people of his country first, in war and in peace.
A great leader becomes great,
because he does great things for his people and makes their lives
better. A great leader receives that designation because the
people give it to him, as a result of what he has done for them.
George bush is not a great leader, he is not even a leader at all.
A great leader is in front, moving out ahead and showing the way.
A great leader steps out first and others will follow his lead
because they have faith in his wisdom and his judgment. A poor
leader must push and force his people because they are unwilling
to follow him and distrustful of his lead. George bush is
not a great leader. George bush is a pusher.
-
I am a mom to Murphy (my precious pup) and Fred
(my occasionally precious cat).
I share my life, my laughter, my world and
all of my love with my husband and have for 16 years.
I would describe myself as a very sentimental and
sensitive person who is forever willing to share my point of view
whether or not it has been requested of me. This
article is copyright by Patricia Ernest, originally published by
opednews.com Permission is
granted to forward this or to place it on a website as long as the
article is included intact, including this statement. New!
Pissed
Off Patricia's BLog