Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (30 comments)

WTC 7 Collapsed at the Same Speed as Known Controlled Demolitions

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan  (3 fans)

opednews.com

::::::::

[Cross-posted here]

Here is a video of the demolition of the Landmark Tower, Fort Worth, Texas.
The Landmark Tower was 380 feet high.

According to the timer on Youtube, it took about 7 seconds from the start of the collapse (once the building started to fall) until the last of the building reached the ground.

Or check it yourself: here is an online stopwatch (click the green arrow on the left).

WTC 7 was 576 feet high (counting the rooftop penthouses, it was 610 feet; but since the penthouses collapsed a couple of seconds before the main building, and was thus part of a different and discrete process from the collapse of the main building, and - most importantly - because the collapse of the penthouse is irrelevant to the question of whether the main building itself fell as fast as known demolitions, we will ignore the penthouses for now).

WTC 7 collapsed in approximately 7 seconds, not counting the earlier collapse of the penthouses. See this video, and other videos here.

So how did a 576-foot building collapse in the same time as a 380-foot building? Even using controlled demo, that would be an impressive feat.

But let's bend over backwards to be reasonable. Let's add a full second to WTC 7's apparent collapse time - let's call it 8 seconds - to be make sure we are not underestimating how long it took building 7 to collapse.

How did a 576-foot building collapse in 8 seconds when a 380-foot building took 7 seconds?   Acceleration would not have caused the additional 196 feet of Building 7 to disappear in the last second.

Bottom line: WTC 7 collapsed at the same speed as known controlled demolitions.

I encourage researchers to compare the collapse times of other demolitions, and then let me know what you find. Other videos of known controlled demolitions can be found here, here and
here.


 

 

George Washington


As a political activist for decades, I have rejoiced in victories for the people and mourned in defeats. I chose the pen name "George Washington" because - as (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
30 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

And.... by Kathryn Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 5:02:09 PM
KS said, by richard on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 6:21:25 PM
Get the science right by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:47:22 AM
YouBoob by Alan Williams on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 8:40:33 PM
You really should read the report... by scott creighton on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 9:02:18 PM
Well, look who's talkin'! by Harold Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:30:35 PM
Right .... by Alan Williams on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:23:52 PM
Politically motivated? by George Washington on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 10:45:25 PM
ROTFLMAO! by Harold Smith on Friday, Sep 5, 2008 at 11:55:34 PM
Nice to see you still have your sense of humor by Tom Murphy on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:41:12 PM
re: politically motivated by Alan Williams on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:13:22 AM
George by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:00:58 AM
Lying by Albvry Smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:44:16 PM
Lying from one who is clearly deceitful "herself" by Tom Murphy on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:58:57 AM
Shut Up, and Listen! by boomerang on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:50:06 PM
Too funny by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:39:58 PM
yawnnn... by boomerang on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:14:23 PM
"Twoofers" by Albvry Smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:52:13 PM
Twitter-pated by Tom Murphy on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:04:14 AM
Ohhh Tom by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:03:30 PM
Around the world in 80 seconds by Nemo on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:11:21 PM
You're preaching to the choir by albury smith on Saturday, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:48:38 PM
re: around the world by Alan Williams on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 1:25:20 AM
Alan should know by Albvry Smith on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 9:58:41 PM
You ARE... odious by Tom Murphy on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 7:05:14 AM
Tom Murphy "In defense of his shill peer" by Albvry Smith on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:01:07 PM
Welcome back, boris becker - being male didn't work for you? by Tom Murphy on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:11:34 PM
Add Len Hart's article to your reading by boomerang on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:14:25 AM
Quite a feat of engineering by Michael McCoy on Sunday, Sep 7, 2008 at 6:37:00 PM
Leaven of the Pharisees by Nemo on Monday, Sep 8, 2008 at 3:38:58 PM