Totalitarianism
by W. Finnerty Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:35
"Rape of the Mind" (as in "The Totalitarianism of the Global Banking Cartel and Supporting Legal Professions") ...
The above sub-heading was one of a number used in an e-mail sent yesterday to Chief Justice Susan Denham (Republic of Ireland), which was copied to some other senior lawyers, to some law firms, and to some senior politicians (among others).
Though many (if not all) of the banks around the world may be hopelessly bankrupt at the present time as far as "paper money" is concerned, largely as a result of their own private multi-trillion Euros "derivatives" gambling debts, there is no reason whatever (that I know of) to believe that any of the leading bankers (e.g. the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and so on) are now bankrupt, or anything remotely like it.
Far from it, it seems to me that these leading bankers -- just a few dozen people, or even less perhaps -- are using their already vast and ever increasing property wealth, mineral/oil/gas reserves "ownership" (on paper) wealth, corporate ownership wealth, "senior politician and senior lawyer ownership" wealth, and so on, to continue implementing and strengthening, by all of the surreptitious means available to them, what can only be described (in my view) as a uniquely totalitarian form of world government, which now looks destined to regulate every realm of life -- for all (or almost all) of the world's six billon (or so) human inhabitants -- in a highly dictatorial and tyrannous manner, and which they, and they alone, will make all the important decisions about.
Hence the overall contents of my e-mail dated January 11th 2011 (i.e. yesterday) to Chief Justice Susan Denham, which can be viewed in full at the following location:
http://www.humanrightsireland.com/IrishLegalProfessions/11January2012/Email.htm
=========================
"The exceptions, and there are honourable ones, are just that, exceptional and egregious."
by W. Finnerty Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:57
Re: Comment made by Opus at Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:11
I note what you say regarding these exceptions (concerning the overall membership of the legal profession).
However, I feel I should point out that -- to date -- and despite the numerous attempts of many different kinds that I (and others who have tried to help me) have made since 1998, and which I have long ago lost count of, I have not succeeded in locating a single lawyer of the type you describe: i.e. one who is willing to use legislation which is already in place, for the purpose of openly and honestly challenging systemic government crime of the kind that involves extremely serious violations of constitutional and human rights law.
Consequently, and if by any chance you might be willing to name one or two such lawyers (that you appear to know of), so that I could approach them for the purpose of trying to find the professional legal representation, and professional legal help, which I continue to desperately need, it would be very much appreciated.
Related Link: http://www.humanrightsireland.com
=========================
Patrick Finucane RIP (1949 -- 1989)
by W. Finnerty Thu Jan 12, 2012 15:59
Re: Comment by Opus at Thu Jan 12, 2012 13:21
And it's not just human rights lawyers like Pat Finucane of Northern Ireland who get themselves assassinated because of their efforts to support genuine justice. ("Two public investigations concluded that elements of the British state apparatus colluded in Finucane's murder and there have been high-profile calls for a public inquiry.") From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Finucane_
Far more importantly (in my view), and having due regard for the fact that the Republic of the United States of America is still the most powerful nation on earth in many (if not almost all) respects, it's also the case that United States lawyers like former Republican President Abraham Lincoln, and former US Attorney General Robert Kennedy, both of whom vigorously supported genuine democracy, and genuine justice, as far as I know, have also been assassinated: while holding high public office.
The situation with former President Abraham Lincoln seems particularly interesting, and worrying (to me at least): in that it was he who provided humanity with the best and simplest definition of genuine democracy that I know of: i.e. "government of the people, by the people, for the people".
How very different President Lincoln's style of genuine democratic government was to the arrogant, dictatorial, tyrannical and totalitarian world "government of the unelected bankers, by the unelected bankers, for the unelected bankers" brand of "democracy" (so called) which we are now all saddled with, and unable -- try as we might it apparently -- to rid ourselves of: as things stand at the present time.
Anyway, many thanks for your reply. I feel I fully understand your situation regarding the "low-level practitioners" restriction you have pointed out.
Related Link: http://showcase.netins.net/web/creative/lincoln/speeches/gettysburg.htm
=========================
All of the text in the three sections above have been copied from comments in the article titled "Petition to the President for a Referendum" at the following Indymedia (Ireland) location:
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/101168
=========================
Human Rights Ireland: www.humanrightsireland.com
=========================
