Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (2 comments)

Erik Larson's Methods vs Ed and Shinki Paik's Accounts - A Rebuttal by CIT

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)      
Become a Fan Become a Fan

opednews.com

A recent set of attacks by blogger Erik Larson succeed only in verifying and confirming the reports and conclusions of Citizen Investigation Team. A north side approach of the Pentagon attack jet is further validated proving the plane did not hit the light poles or the building.

::::::::

Recently I posted a debate challenge (Craig Ranke Challenges Erik Larson to Debate) to Erik Larson (aka loose nuke & Rancho Truth) because of his hit-piece against us regarding Dawn Vignola's account.

The very next day he released a new article regarding witness Edward Paik who is featured in The PentaCon Smoking Gun Version and National Security Alert.


Edward Paik


Ed's account is absolutely critical because he saw the plane as it definitively diverged from the official flight path while it passed from the south to the north side of Columbia Pike as he illustrated here (he marked his location with a circle):



Ed Paik's illustrated flight path


The official story REQUIRES the plane to be on the south side of Columbia Pike at all times like this:



Official south side flight path



Erik Larson actually provides a brand new video recorded interview with Ed and his brother Shinki Paik (Jan 2010) that really just confirms that we reported accurately and confirms that Edward saw the plane fly over Shinki's auto shop (A-One Auto) on the NORTH side of Columbia Pike.

But that didn't stop Larson from attacking us personally and accusing us of being deceptive anyway. A rebuttal to his hilarious "attack" piece that really only helps prove the plane did not hit the light poles or the Pentagon is available here:

Erik Larson confirms north side approach! Ed Paik's path independently confirmed


Thanks Larson! We've always encouraged people who doubt us to interview the witnesses themselves and now you know why! Hopefully you'll go on to independently confirm the other north side approach witnesses as well!

Originally posted here:
Erik Larson's Methods vs Ed and Shinki Paik's Accounts - A Rebuttal by CIT

Formal debate challenge:
Craig Ranke challenges Erik Larson to debate

Related article:
Summary to "Dawn Vignola's Account vs Erik Larson's Methods by CIT" by Adam Syed

 

www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com

www.CitizenInvestigationTeam.com

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this diary has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

More CIT Nonsense by b. j. edwards on Tuesday, Feb 9, 2010 at 3:42:10 PM
podcast address by Craig Ranke on Sunday, Feb 14, 2010 at 1:05:55 PM