Back OpEd News | |||||||
Original Content at https://www.opednews.com/articles/How-Ben-Systemic-Risk-Be-by-Shalom-P-Hamou-090826-800.html (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher). |
August 28, 2009
How Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke Deliberatly Created The Great Recession.
By Shalom P. Hamou
How Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke Deliberatly Created The Great Recession.
::::::::
Article3How Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke Deliberatly Created The Great Recession.It is not equivalent to Milton Friedman's famous "helicopter drop" of money. In fat it is the exact opposite.
The necessary consequences of the monetary policy that was implemented after the crash is to decrease the marginal return on capital (long-term yields), create the Mother of the Bubbles and increase the price of minerals (Oil, Precious Metals, Base Metals...).
I have proved that Bernanke mismanaged the sub prime crisis:
Ben "Systemic Risk" Bernanke is no beginner in crashes and economic depressions he even wrote a book on th subject: Essays on the Great Depression 2000. He has expleined again and again that what he did was exactly what he knew was the contrary of what he did.
The problem of the sub-prime MBS were known already to the public at the end of 2006. It is not hard to suppose that it was known before to the Federal Reserve System.In fact several month before as that Market was not transparent to say the least.
Google Trends on "Sub Prime".
Knowing that such a risk existed, according to his speeches and his book,
Bernanke should have lowered the short-term rates before December 2006.
It is only on September 18th, 2007 that Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke lowered the target
fed fund rate from 5.25% by a mere 0.50% to 4.75%!
On March 5th, 2009 the 30 Years US Treasury Bond yield went as low as 4.621%.
It went as low as 4.617% on September 10, 2007!
On December 11 He lowered the target for Fed Funds by ridiculous 0.25%
When on December 4th the yield on 30 Years US Treasury Bonds were 4.309%.
On January 31 he raised the target to 4.25%. When on January 23, 2008 t
he yield on the 30 Years US Treasury Bond was as low as 4.102%!!!
Prof. Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke
Japanese Monetary Policy: A Case of Self-Induced Paralysis?.
For presentation at the ASSA meetings,
Boston MA, .
9th January 2000
It was never relevant to Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke that average American, notably those who were
reimbursing variable rate mortgages, or those who lost asstes and jobs did suffer from these strict monetary policy.
Should he have acted decisively and normalised the yield curve by lowering, according to our computation, the rates to around 1% when he knew what was happening, the sub prime mess wouldn't have occurred and the number of mortgage who defaulted would have been a fraction of what they were.
Beware I am not saying that these analysis are right, what I am saying is given his knowledge and his experience, if he wanted to avoid the Crash, which he saw coming he would have acted completly differently.
Was it the result of indecisiveness, mere stupidity or more worrisome, a carefully planed sabotage?
An Intended Mistake:
I have learned several things in my previous life as a trader:
- When you can turn to only one person or institution in order to solve a problem, they did cause it in the first place.
- When a professional make a mistake more often than not he did that on purpose.
He had means, motive, and opportunity and he did take the opportunity he is, according to US Criminal law it is sufficient to convict him beyond a reasonable doubt for a premeditated crime.
Given the precedent of Bernard Madoff he would get, given the volume of the losses caused, at least 150 years in jail.
The only purpose of the crash and The Great Recession was to put in place the necessary conditions of The Crash at the time The New Forces had decided to trigger it. According to my computation had he acted otherwise The Crash, which was unavoidable, would have happen at a much later date.
In fact we know with a great precision when Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke learned about the sub prime mess:
He took office on 1st February 2006.
When he took office the target was 4.5%; he increased them up to 5.25% with the intetion of inverting the yield curve sufficiently in order to create the Crash (see below The Puzzle of the Dyamic of a Crash.) on 29th June 2006. On 17th August 2006 he stopped to increase the rates. It is very difficult or almost impossible to time the Crash so Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke increased the rates till he was sure he had reached his goal. So he has learned that his objective was reached between 29th June 2006 and 17th August 2006.
This is only part of my case against Ben 'Systemic Risk' Bernanke.
The fact that Prof. Paul Robin Krugman, Nobel Prize of economy and Professor Nouriel Roubini alias 'Dr. Doom' support his nomination in January makes me wonder about their motives.
When the Bubble Bursts we will be in a Keynes' Liquidity Trap and in a Deep Depression.
"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency.
By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate,
secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their
citizens.
...
Lenin was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of
overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency.
The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction,
and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose."
John Maynard Keynes, 1st Baron Keynes of Tilton
The Economic Consequences of the Peace.
pp. 235-248.
1919
No monetary or fiscal policy will pull the World out of The Deep Depression.
Di Zeit: "Can the right monetary and fiscal policy keep the US out of a recession?"
Alan Greenspan: "Probably not. Global forces can now override most
anything that monetary and fiscal policy can do. Long-term real
interest rates have significantly more impact on the core of economic
activity than the individual actions of nations. Central banks have
increasingly lost their capacity to influence the longer end of the
market.
Two to three decades, ago central banks were dominant throughout the maturity schedule.
Thus, the more important question is the direction of long-term real interest rates."
Chairman Alan Greenspan
The Great Irony of Success.
ZEIT online, 30tn January 2008