Back OpEd News | |||||||
Original Content at https://www.opednews.com/articles/A-Canadian-Evaluates-the-U-by-Steve-Beckow-081019-292.html (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher). |
October 20, 2008
A Canadian Responds to the NAU
By Steve Beckow
Americans must face the fact that Canadians know the immoral, unethical, and criminal behaviour of your government. I assert that, as friendly as Canadians are to the average, peace-loving American, the vast majority of Canadians do not, under any circumstances, want to be part of the United States of America.
::::::::
Please allow me to give you a Canadian’s straightforward evaluation of some trends in the United States of America and Canada and please be courageous enough to hear me. This article does not arise, so far as I am aware, because of any single event today, not even the global financial meltdown, but because, for whatever reason, I cannot remain quiet about what I have to say here a moment longer.
Let us start with what you call the “North-American Union,” following on from the so-called “Security and Prosperity Partnership.”
The provision of the SPP that will sink the Canadian ship and allow your leaders to take this country over, as I believe they wish to do, is the provision that troops on both sides of the border can enter the other country in the event of a terrorist incident. Now when would Canadian troops enter the United States? That surely is not why that provision is there.
Keep in mind my view as stated many times on this site (OpEdNews) that there was no original “terrorist” incident on Sept. 11, 2001. 9/11 was indeed, as popular culture now has it, an “inside job.” It was a false-flag operation, an engineered instance of mass murder and high treason, designed to trick the American people into going to war for the interests of an elite cabal which includes your current President, Vice-President, and most of his cabinet.
I am led to believe that charges are being prepared at the present time against President Bush, Vice-President Cheney and high aides, as well as military and intelligence officials once they have left office and lose immunity to prosecution. I am sure the investigators will uncover the treachery of 9/11.
If you follow my thinking in this, then who would be the source of that “terrorist incident” that would trigger an invasion of Canada? Your country would be - the same people who engineered the World Trade Center and Pentagon bombings: your government, Northern Command, NORAD, the CIA and the FBI.
9/11 protesters in Montreal confronted their city council with their knowledge that the same security company that was in charge of the World Trade Center had also been recently given the contract for the security of the Montreal subway. They told the mayor to be aware that they will know what has happened in the event of a second 9/11 in the Montreal subway.
Are you aware that one of your intsruments of state protection, the Central Intelligence Agency, plays a key role worldwide in the operation of the global drug trade? Take its one-time Director, George H.W. Bush, the same George Bush Sr. who, as a young CIA agent, stood at the door of the Texas Book Repository the day Kennedy was assassinated, later to be President (yes, President) of the United States. I allege that, as CIA Director, George Bush Sr. knowingly and regularly ran drug shipments into the US from Ilopango Airport in Honduras and killed his own agents and military personnel to keep the fact hidden. If I am correct, you can see why I would not want your institutions of state protection to be "protecting" Canada. To the vast majority of Americans who are sane and peace-loving, with whom Canadians have always been friends, with whom we share an undefended border of many, many miles, and with whom English-Canadians share a very similar culture, you must know that we do not want American troops in Canada. We appeal to you as the ones who must put a stop to this never-ending cycle of violence and oppression that your government is addicted to. We do not want to be a part of the American state. I know that most of you are man and woman enough to hear that and accept it. Wherein is our culture different from yours and why is the continued independence of Canada a good thing? We are engaged in a different experiment than you. Our government hails from a different period of history, one that we know of as “responsible government.” Responsible government means that the head of the administration sits in the legislature and is the head of the largest party there. It means that, when conflict exists in Parliament such that a no-confidence motion passes against the ruling party, the government of the day falls. President Kennedy recognized the situation when he told Dean Rusk in 1960, after the Bay of Pigs, that, if this were Canada, President Kennedy would have to go. (And so it would be.) But, since it is the United States, Rusk would have to go. I am most confident in saying that the vast majority of Canadians like their form of government. Perhaps not their contemporary leaders, but their parliamentary system. We do not want your system of checks and balances. You can see what frustrations you have with it. It does not work as well as ours. So the continued existence of Canada on this continent offers a political alternative and enriches our joint political life. Our judiciary is different than yours. It is not elected. It is allowed an arm’s length relationship from government. I say, without equivocation, that our judiciary, with a few minor exceptions, is wise and fair. When I served as a refugee tribunal member, I read the decisions of our courts as one might read a newspaper or magazine, they were so well-argued and judicious. Canadian caselaw is consulted in many other jurisdictions. In my opinion, America has a great deal to learn from the Canadian judiciary. Our police remain largely uncorrupted. Yes, like all countries, we are affected by a slide into fascism. Just as the world’s markets and financial institutions have revealed the extent to which they have patterned themselves on those of America, so do a small number of our police follow your example. But I feel no division within myself when I use the word “decent” and extend it to the vast majority of Canada's police. (And, yes, I am aware of exceptions.) We love our universal medicare. We do not want you to undermine it by coming into Canada and opening up public/private projects that trigger NAFTA and threaten to kill our universal-medicare system. My American friends, hear me: I am fully covered in the event of illness – please know that. I do not pay hundreds of dollars a month for my medical coverage. I do not live in fear of losing my home if I get ill. There is no shame in universal medicare. We as a country are affording it. It is not “socialism.” Stop being afraid of being labelled a "socialist" if you support universal medicare. It is the manifestation of a caring society. No matter how far we may remain from it at this time, our country has taken up Prime Minister Trudeau’s challenge to build a “just society.” In some areas, such as our obligation to First Nations, we have much work to do, mature, courageous work, not simply buying someone off. Our citizens do not, except for hunters, bear arms. Canadians have shown by their example that they respect the law (please hear me: respect the law) and, when they do not, they work through legal means to change it. Can you say the same of yourselves as a contemporary society? If not, why not? A wave of devastating neoconservatism has swept through the United States in the last fifty years and has brought in governments that are capable of blowing up their own citizens (9/11, Oklahoma City, the I35 Bridge collapse, the U.S.S. Liberty), raining barium and depleted uranium down on them in chemtrails in the name of depopulation (you must hear that I am serious in saying this), coveting their Social-Security funds, refusing them universal medicare, corrupting the American Congress, making murderous war on the citizens of other countries, and dozens of other sad circumstances which, I'm afraid, will enter into the record of your history. We in Canada do not want truck or trade with this neoconservative coalition – with your Trilateral Commission or Council on Foreign Relations, with your Project for a New American Century or with any of your outrageous councilors from Henry Kissinger to Zbigniew Brzezinski. We do not want your brand of predatory capitalism, with its worthless commercial paper, speculative debt, and cutthroat practices. In trade negotiations, we look upon America as an 800-lb gorilla. Your negotiators act like the town bully – and you should know this of yourself – threatening, perpetually offering your partners in trade the short end of the stick, lowering their living standards, robbing them of their resources. The tragedy of America today is shared by the world because once the world looked up to America (and we will look up to you again). But right now you have your own house to put in order. Do not export your corruption and murderous cabals to our countries. Cease interfering with Canada and the rest of the world. Draw back within your own borders and come to your senses. Let your next president address these matters and begin your imperative need to heal. Tell me that you have heard me. Tell me that you see that we are not simply a land of igloos and snowshoes, as you imagine. Tell me that you know that we are an independent and viable sociopolitical entity whose government may just run better than yours (do I hear any one of you taking issue today with what I have just said?), whose judiciary works better than yours, and whose police are more honest than yours. You would do well to investigate how it is that our fully independent and viable country runs as well as it does and give up ideas of taking us over.
If you had this system, President Bush would not be in power today. Nor would President Nixon have remained in power as long as he did, dragging your country through Watergate.
But, for the most part, we labour together to produce a society in which, by law and civil right, all cultures can co-exist, equal opportunity is extended to women as well as men, and all religions are respected and none demonized (especially not Islam, falsely made the scapegoat for 9/11).
We don’t want NAFTA, in which your goods come into Canada freely but some ground is found to keep our goods out. We are not here to be part of your hinterland. We are an independent country, “the true North strong and free.” and wish to remain so. We wish to deal with you fairly, as your respected partner.
The author is a former Member of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada and a member of Mensa Canada.
He is the author of several Internet books and articles on gender persecution, cross-cultural spirituality, life after death, and the 2012 scenario.
He has two websites on 2012: "The 2012 Scenario" at http:/stevebeckow.com and "First Contact" at http://www.angelfire.com/space2/light11/fc/fc-index1.html.