Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/OCM-Applauds-Fifth-Circuit-by-Organization-of-Co-080723-101.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

July 23, 2008

OCM Applauds Fifth Circuit Packers and Stockyards Act Decision

By Organization of Competitive Markets - press release

The Organization of Competitive Markets hails the 5th Circuit Court decision in Wheeler v. Pilgrim's Pride which finds that producers don't need to prove "adverse effect on competition" to sue for unfair or deceptive practices. This is a win for small producers against the large meatpackers, and a battle that goes to the heart of critical efforts to return real competition to a country controlled by corporations.

::::::::

For Immediate Release: July 23, 2008

Lincoln, NE – The Organization for Competitive Markets (OCM) hailed a decision released Monday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (Wheeler v. Pilgrim’s Pride) holding that a plaintiff need not prove an adverse effect on competition to prevail in a suit alleging a violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act. There is an unwise split of authority on this issue among the federal Circuit Courts. OCM appreciates this well-considered ruling that makes it easier for producers to prevail in a suit against meat packers.

“Pro-packer courts have repeatedly overturned jury verdicts in favor of the major packers in Packers and Stockyards Act (P&S Act) litigation,” said Keith Mudd, OCM President. “The courts have ignored the actual words of the P&S Act which prohibits unfair practices. Instead, the courts have looked far afield to find new hurdles preventing justice. For example, some courts have required producers to prove not only that a packer act or practice was unfair or deceptive, but also that the practice caused an ‘adverse effect on competition’ in the entire industry.”

“Proving ‘harm to competition’ is prohibitively expensive for producers in most cases because economic experts must be hired to create expensive national industry models, produce reports,and show how the whole industry was harmed,” said Michael Stumo, OCM General Counsel.  
 
“The exercise is irrelevant to whether a particular producer was harmed by a packer. The Fifth Circuit read the statute, saw no ‘harm to competition’ requirement in the statutory language, and rationally held that the poultry producer plaintiffs did not need to address something not in the P&S Act.”

“OCM has, for 10 years, promoted the proper interpretation of the P&S Act in livestock and poultry litigation. We congratulate the law firm of Patton & Tidwell for this decision,” continued Stumo. “Continuous work and vigilance is necessary in the courts, in Congress, and at the USDA. OCM believes that fair, open and competitive markets are in the best interest of the whole industry.”

OCM is a national non-profit organization working for fair open and competitive markets domestically and internationally.

Organization for Competitive Markets
P.O. Box 6486
Lincoln, NE 68506
www.competitivemarkets.com
Contacts: Michael Stumo, 413-854-2580, stumo@competitivemarkets.com
Fred Stokes, 662-476-5568 or 601-527-2459,
tfredstokes@hughes.net


Submitter: Linn Cohen-Cole

Submitters Bio:
Met libertarian and conservative farmers and learned an incredible amount about farming and nature and science, as well as about government violations against them and against us all. The other side of the fence is nothing like what we've been taught to assume but great people with immense decency.

Back