Included in this opinion article is a link to a 9-11 truth article which is the most indicting I have ever seen, where Bush and Cheney's pre-911 planning is concerned. No conspiracy theorists here: Only CIA agents, Senators, and FBI agents are quoted. This could be one of the most important articles you will ever read: Check it out and please pass this on!

::::::::

Think about it.

The Psychiatric Wards in hospitals are not allowed to hold people against their will, even when it is a psychiatric emergency.

Except, however, when the patient is a danger to themselves or others. That is the only time the psychiatric wards are not allowed to release people, until the danger has passed.

Does Congress fit the bill? Do Bush and Cheney fit the profile?

Think about it again. I am not being nasty! I am being real:

Could a stranger on the street send our kids to die for a lie if s/he was President of the United States? My bet is that 99.9% of the ordinary people walking the streets could never dream of such a thing, let alone do it.

Could you, dear reader, send our kids to war based on a lie, knowing the dangers to them and all that they would be suffering? And their families too?

Of course not!

Enter Bush and Cheney who not only went to war based on a lie, but who have tried to monger more wars and have openly declared their intentions to continue to wage war without end.

FYI terrorism has always existed.

Prior to Bush's presidency, there never was a terrorist attack on America. If Bush declares that he is protecting us because there has not been a repeat attack, I counter: There never was an attack prior to your presidency, Mr. Bush. What does that tell us all about you?

So how necessary is the war on terrorism if  we were amply protected before? Hmmmm.......

 So there goes Bush, *allowing* 9-11 to happen and stonewalling any and all investigations of 9-11.

www.patriotsaints.com/News/911/Conspiracy/IntelligenceKnew/ This is the open letter from retired FBI agent Ted Gunderson to Bush, Ashcroft and the public concerning: a) Pre-911 FBI intelligence warnings being repeatedly discredited and turned down b) challenging the "need" for the Patriot Act (there never WAS any breakdown in communications or lack of intelligence warnings!) c) Calling for the overturning of the Patriot Act and, by implication, accusing Bush and Ashcroft and others of treason in allowing 9-11 to happen. Be sure to click on the backup file: The original has been removed from the web.

 Enter Congress into the picture.

Congress knows that the war in Iraq was conceived based on a lie, yet they continue to fund the war based on lies. IE, they continue to fund mass murder.

They refuse to talk the real truth about 9-11, knowing that all evidence of the fallen structures was whisked away before anyone could investigate the crime scene. This never happens when a crime has been committed. Except, that is, to cover up evidence.

While pretending to chase after terrorists, the post-911 legislation in actual fact is written in such a way as to crack down on vocal people. Witness the Patriot Act's definition of "Terrorism" which includes activists and free speech in its definition. Hmmmm......amazing how more than 20 legal entities across the partisan spectrum agree in that analysis of the Patriot Act's "Terrorist" definition and in its attempts to quell free speech/dissent.

What of the flexible "free speech zones" in the Patriot Act?

Oh, let's not forget that the Military Commissions Act (torture bill) grants the President immunity for torturing people. Torture is defined as invoking pain levels "equivalent to severe organ failure and death".

Who approved this? Congress.

And they refuse to impeach two war-mongering mass murderers who are turning the Constitution upside-down, affecting the quality of life of ordinary citizens in so doing.

Is the comparison to Charles Manson and his gang an unfair one, under this circumstance? I will let you be the judge.

And guess who is paying these mass murderers? We the People.

Therefore it is we ourselves who are complicit if we remain silent.

Is it time for Congress to visit the psychiatric ward and never come out again? Maybe.

Is it time for Bush and Cheney to visit the psychiatric ward and never be released? There's just no question about it. The answer is "YES" and all partisanships would agree.

IMPEACHMENT IS TOO GOOD FOR THEM. JAIL IS MORE LIKE IT. BARRING THAT, INSTITUTIONALIZE THEM. FOR LIFE!

Authors Bio:
This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism:

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul Revere, House of Commons