Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_david_mo_080114_ron_paul_3a_how_ignora.htm
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

January 14, 2008

Ron Paul: How ignorance is hindering both sides

By David Monk

It's a critcal take on MSM and TV pundits under the light of the recent smear campaign of Dr. Ron Paul.

::::::::

        By now you have heard all the stories on how Ron Paul is a racist

or how he might be.The fact of the matter is simple really; you have to

decide for yourself. When you compare the stories written under his

name in a newsletter against everything he has ever said he becomes

clear what happened. All the time spent analyzing the story is working

to the advantage of those who put the story out. What is important is

the issue that are being brought up indirectly by the story. If you have

followed Dr. Ron Paul even moderately you knew about this a long time

ago and should come as no surprise. So the question is why is everyone

seemingly so shocked. Do you mean to tell me that TV pundits just read

what they are brought or do they actually look some of this stuff up

themselves? In that regard how often do they do this with more

important stories? For me, the question of how often TV pundits

research anything at all is a big deal. It would seem that it doesn’t

happen at all if you listened to Wolf Blitzer’s interview of Dr. Paul about

the smear campaign.

     It’s easy to say the MSM doesn’t do their job and even easier to

criticize TV pundits trying to fill hours a day. But the real question is, is

any of the news completely correct at any time at all? To me, the

amazement of these TV pundits is either an act or they really just read

this stuff and hope they are right? If either scenario is correct the

general public should have real concern about the information they are

getting on a daily basis. I do not feel this to be your regular down with

the MSM piece but hopefully a fair reflection of the state of media

today.

      So I guess I am one of those ignorant followers of Dr. Paul with no

insight who spends all of my time posting comments and text Fox News

after a debate. The funny thing about that is I can not text Fox News

because my broke behind can only afford Cricket who does not

participate in the Fox News polls. If anything those text polls could be

considered elitist as one would need to have a cell phone with a

national or major company to even participate. Those of us too poor to

afford paying for minutes or to even have a cell phone are simply left

out. So to me it would seem that the ignorance on both sides seems to

be feeding into one another.

         You have people brand new to the political game seemingly

everywhere and right next to them some uppity reporter taking glee in

the awkward struggle of finding their political voice. So it’s the

ignorance of the new and the ignorance of the "been there" butting

heads. It reminds me of a line from a Queen song from the Day at the

Races album, "The man who learned how to teach and then forgot how

to learn." To downplay the rise of any grassroots campaign no matter

their level of political comprehension is to belittle us all and to say there

is no hope for change. Unless of course the MSM and TV pundits say it’s

ok, cause one would be have to be crazy not to listen to them, right?

        I would argue for you not to even listen to me but to decide for

yourself. If it turns out after all the information is out and all platforms

have been reviewed and you still want to vote and support Dr. Paul. We

can all just be crazy, misinformed, fringe never gonna get anywhere rag

tag bunch of misfits together. The difference between before the Dr.

Ron Paul movement and after is that we will have each other.

Peace, Love and Solidarity with the movement as always, David Monk



Authors Website: www.myspace.com/Iamtherev0luti0n

Authors Bio:
I am 28 and in College studying Political Science.

Back