Here come the NH elections and there is rightfully an outcry concerning the theft of votes from Obama to Clinton. I am glad to see the outcry. Yet, nobody is crying "Foul" about the fact that the mainstream polls claim that Kucinich is at the bottom of the pile, with only 2% in his favor. That simply cannot possibly be true, according to all the independent polls he won. Why is this not prevalent on the public radar?

::::::::

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_kucinich_080109_check_out_how_many_p.htm

Kucinich has won the endorsement of Democratic Candidates on state-wide bases such as in Vermont, Washington, Virginia and more. He consistently scores the highest in *independent* Democratic polls, running not only neck-and-neck with Obama, Clinton and Edwards, but even outscoring them all most of the time. In other words, according to Democratic circles, Kucinich is the favored Democratic Candidate.

In fact, Kucinich has earned scores ranging anywhere from 39% of the *independent* Democratic polls to as much as 77%  of the poll votes!

See the polls in the link above for further proof.

In addition, ABC and MSM report that even according to their polls, Kucinich was the favored Democratic debator.

Here come the NH elections and there is rightfully an outcry concerning the theft of votes from Obama to Clinton. I am glad to see the outcry.

Yet, nobody is crying "Foul" about the fact that the mainstream polls claim that Kucinich is at the bottom of the pile, with only 2% in his favor.

That simply cannot possibly be true, according to all the independent polls.

Based on those mainstream "polls" Kucinich, Paul, and Gravel have been left out of public debates.

Who is funding those mainstream polls? Are they being tweaked intentionally for agenda-based corporate interests, telling voters to "Go home now, don't vote for Candidate X, Y or Z" ? Are these mainstream polls the ones to be questioned, or the independent polls? Why such a huge discrepancy? It's pretty unbelievable, far surpassing the 5% or 10% discrepancies in the votes between Obama and Clinton.

WHY IS THE VOTE THEFT FROM KUCINICH NOT ON THE PUBLIC RADAR EVERY BIT AS MUCH AS THE THEFT FROM OBAMA TO CLINTON?

WHY IS NOBODY CRYING FOUL?

WHY IS NOBODY CLAMPING DOWN ON THE MEDIA FOR CRACKING DOWN ON FREE SPEECH, FOR CONTROLLING THE AMERICAN VOTE AND BRAINWASHING A NATION OF PEOPLE?

THERE SHOULD BE LAWSUITS LEFT AND RIGHT. MAYBE THEN THEY'LL "GET IT" AND STOP PLAYING THESE MALICIOUS TRICKS ON US, THE PEOPLE AND ON THE CONSTITUTION ITSLEF. (Crimes against the Constitution are called "high crimes", by the way).

If we the people don't step forward and do our part to hold the media publicly accountable, we ourselves are to blame.

If the rightful Democratic winner loses with the false reputation of having only 2% of the votes, then it is also our fault.

And Kucinich is one of the few to fight for the preservation of the Constitution, civil liberties, is against the Iraq War, has the courage of a lion and a heart of gold.

Shame on the American people for not crying "Foul!"
Please join the public call and help get this on the public radar. Please write your editors, post to blogs, etc it's about time the election theft stopped and hijackers of the Constitution were no longer enabled to rise up and march like the Gestapo. 

It is not merely the precincts which steal the votes, but the mainstream polls as well. Based on tweaking of those polls Candidates are left out of debates. As if free speech can ever "rightfully" and with "good reason" ever be clamped down on. This is not on the public radar: Please help by writing letters to the editor and posting to blogs. Thank you for helping!

Authors Bio:
This quote summarizes the nature of my concerns and the content of personal experiences which stir my activism:

"Necessity is the plea for every infringement on human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves". --Paul Revere, House of Commons