Back OpEd News | |||||||
Original Content at https://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_andrew_b_070823_tappers_and_listener.htm (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher). |
August 23, 2007
Tappers and Listeners: A Relevant Challenge from a Book Entitled "Made to Stick"
By Andrew Schmookler
Here's a vivid illustration of how the attempt to communicate can be subverted by the "Curse of Knowledge." It poses a challege that we --who know in detail the lies and crimes of this Bushite regime-- might usefully contemplate.
::::::::
Here is a passage from the Introduction to MADE TO STICK, by Chip Heath and Dan Heath. The text of the entire introduction can be found at
click here />
After this passage, I will give a few thoughts of my own about how this bears upon the challenge we are facing in dealing with this Bushite crisis.
***************************
Tappers and Listeners
In 1990, Elizabeth Newton earned a Ph.D. in psychology at Stanford by studying a simple game in which she assigned people to one of two roles: "tappers" or "listeners." Tappers received a list of twenty-five well-known songs, such as "Happy Birthday to You" and "The StarSpangled Banner." Each tapper was asked to pick a song and tap out the rhythm to a listener (by knocking on a table). The listener's job was to guess the song, based on the rhythm being tapped. (By the way, this experiment is fun to try at home if there's a good "listener" candidate nearby.)
The listener's job in this game is quite difficult. Over the course of Newton's experiment, 120 songs were tapped out. Listeners guessed only 2.5 percent of the songs: 3 out of 120.
But here's what made the result worthy of a dissertation in psychology. Before the listeners guessed the name of the song, Newton asked the tappers to predict the odds that the listeners would guess correctly. They predicted that the odds were 50 percent. The tappers got their message across 1 time in 40, but they thought they were getting their message across 1 time in 2. Why?
When a tapper taps, she is hearing the song in her head. Go ahead and try it for yourself — tap out "The Star-Spangled Banner." It's impossible to avoid hearing the tune in your head. Meanwhile, the listeners can't hear that tune — all they can hear is a bunch of disconnected taps, like a kind of bizarre Morse Code.
In the experiment, tappers are flabbergasted at how hard the listeners seem to be working to pick up the tune. Isn't the song obvious? The tappers' expressions, when a listener guesses "Happy Birthday to You" for "The Star-Spangled Banner," are priceless: How could you be so stupid?
It's hard to be a tapper. The problem is that tappers have been given knowledge (the song title) that makes it impossible for them to imagine what it's like to lack that knowledge. When they're tapping, they can't imagine what it's like for the listeners to hear isolated taps rather than a song. This is the Curse of Knowledge. Once we know something, we find it hard to imagine what it was like not to know it. Our knowledge has "cursed" us. And it becomes difficult for us to share our knowledge with others, because we can't readily re-create our listeners' state of mind.
The tapper/listener experiment is reenacted every day across the world. The tappers and listeners are CEOs and frontline employees, teachers and students, politicians and voters, marketers and customers, writers and readers. All of these groups rely on ongoing communication, but, like the tappers and listeners, they suffer from enormous information imbalances.
****************************
My thoughts:
The subtitle of MADE TO STICK is "Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die." Or it might be put: Why some ideas catch on and others don't.
Since NoneSoBlind --and indeed the entire movement to save America from the depredations of the criminal and fascist enterprise called the Bush administration-- is in the business of trying to get certain ideas to sweep the nation in order to drive the forces of evil out of power and into ignominy, reading this book seemed a natural choice.
In general, I recommend this book, which is (and describes itself as being) a kind of successor the Gladwell's THE TIPPING POINT. (I read Gladwell's book around the time I was first getting ready to launch NoneSoBlind.)
In the specific passage quoted above, the Heath brothers are introducing the concept of "The Curse of Knowledge," and true to their own credo, they use a vivid and concrete example to bring the matter to life: the story of "The Tappers and the Listeners." The Tappers consistently over-estimate how readily the Listeners will recognize the Whole (the actual tune) to which the Tappers are alluding (through their rhythmic tapping.)
We who are now calling for the impeachment of the gangsters now in power are in the position of the Tappers. And we're consistently disappointed that the Listeners do not more readily recognize the Whole (the elaborate tapestry of dark doings, of crimes and lies) to which we make allusion in our call.
Now, we here have recently had occasion to remember that not all Listeners should be lumped together. With some Listeners, there appears to be an impentrable barrier to their hearing. Or, to paraphrase the famous line which is the source of the name of NSB: "There are none so deaf as those who will not hear."
But other Listeners presumably are not so deeply invested in remaining unaware of those blatant and vital truths that underly our call for impeachment. Perhaps they simply have not been paying so much attention, or have not been working on seeing the patterns that the bits of information form together.
With those people, we are challenged to speak in a manner that evades "The Curse of Knowledge," i.e. that does not depend upon their knowing what seems clear to us, their not already hearing in their minds the tune that we already hear clearly in our own.
It is in view of that challenge that I thought it apt to post here this vivid bit of research about the Tappers and the Listeners. Not that I have any answers to how the challenge, but just that I thought it important to recognize that this is indeed a part of the challenge we face in trying to get our ideas to catch on with more of our countrymen.
This passage --and indeed the book MADE TO STICK as a whole-- helps to raise the question: Just how should we fashion a message to our fellow Americans that will help them to more fully understand (and act on) the lawlessness of this regime and the need to strip them of their powers to wreak further destruction?