it's easy to be brave, courageous, compassionate, and loyal to the Kurds when it's someone else who is doing the killing and dying. It's not as easy to display such traits when it's you, the interventionist, who is doing the killing and dying.

::::::::

From Information Clearing House

Max Boot is a conservative commentator who is also an interventionist. (Or am I being redundant?) Boot favored the Iraq War, before he later turned against it when he saw what a fiasco it turned out to be. He also favored the war on Afghanistan. Today, like other Republicans and Democrats, he is criticizing President Trump for "betraying" the Kurds by relocating 50 U.S. troops who were serving as sacrificial tripwires to deter Turkey from attacking the Kurds.

The question I have for Boot, along with all other Republican and Democratic interventionists, is: Why don't you yourself go to Syria and help out the Kurds?

After all, it's easy to be brave, courageous, compassionate, and loyal to the Kurds when it's someone else who is doing the killing and dying. It's not as easy to display such traits when it's you, the interventionist, who is doing the killing and dying.

Now, I know what Boot would say. He'd say, "Jacob, I'm 50 years old. This is war. That's something for young people, not for people of my age. I need to stay here and write my commentaries explaining 'we' should help the Kurds."

But a story in yesterday's Washington Post blows that argument right out of the water. The story is about a Hollywood actor named Michael Enright who is a British citizen. Like Boot and other interventionists, he was concerned about the plight of the Kurds. Unlike Boot and other interventionists, he decided to put his money where his mouth is.

Enright bought a plane ticket, bought some war gear, packed his bags, and headed to Syria. He joined up with the Kurds, who gave him an AK-47 and trained him how to use it. He then engaged in many life-risking firefights against ISIS enemies.

Now, I know what you're thinking. You're thinking that Enright is about 19-20 years old.

Not so!

Enright is 50 years old. That's the same age as Max Boot! So if Enright can go to Syria to help the Kurds, why can't Boot? Why does Boot settle for pleading with Trump to send U.S. soldiers to kill and die for the Kurds when he (Boot) isn't willing to do so, as Enright was?

One interesting aspect of Enright's experience is that he now has an expired visa and U.S. officials won't let him back into the United States to resume his acting career in Hollywood. It's not yet clear why they are taking that position given that he was fighting one of the U.S. national-security establishment's many official enemies in this case, ISIS, the official enemy that was brought into existence as a result of the U.S. government's invasion of Iraq. Enright is staying in Belize and running out of money while he waits to be permitted to reenter the United States.

How about it, Boot? Are you willing to do what Enright has done? Are you willing to go to Syria, as he did, and help the Kurds? Why not? What's your excuse? Why is your 50-year-old life more valuable than the life of a 21-year-old soldier with a wife and three kids? Why not lead by example by helping the Kurds yourself rather than pleading with President Trump to send U.S. soldiers to do the fighting for you?

Authors Website: http://www.fff.org

Authors Bio:

Jacob G. Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation. He was born and raised in Laredo, Texas, and received his B.A. in economics from Virginia Military Institute and his law degree from the University of Texas. He was a trial attorney for 12 years in Texas. He also was an adjunct professor at the University of Dallas, where he taught law and economics. In 1987, Mr. Hornberger left the practice of law to become director of programs at the Foundation for Economic Education. He has advanced freedom and free markets on talk-radio stations all across the country.