Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Why-Bernie-Sanders-Must-Fi-by-Brian-Lynch-Bernie-Sanders-2016-Presidential-Candidate_Democratic_Sanders-Bernard-160506-766.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

May 6, 2016

Why Bernie Sanders Must Fight for a Contested Convention

By Brian Lynch

Given the state of the two parties, a Sanders win would be a foregone conclusion. All the polls say as much, yet this is message isn't seeping into the consciousness of the establishment. The Democratic Party is eager to put Hillary's negatives up against Trump's negatives any day, in yet another hold-your-nose-and-vote election.

::::::::

In Response to Rachel Maddow's May 2nd Segment on Why Bernie Should Bow Out of the Race.

A self-organized rally in New York City for anti-establishment candidate, Bernie Sanders
A self-organized rally in New York City for anti-establishment candidate, Bernie Sanders
(Image by Brian T. Lynch, MSW)
  Details   DMCA

by Brian T. Lynch, MSW

Dear Dr. Maddow,

I'm a fan of yours, but I join those writing in opposition to your arguments against Bernie's ideas of a contested Democratic convention. The rules are set up to allow for this type of contested convention. Whether or not a trailing candidate for the Democratic nomination chooses to bring their fight to the floor has always been predicated on exigent circumstances of the times, not just institutional courtesy or party loyalty.

In prior presidential party contests, opposing or insurgent candidates have fought for the support of their party with the goal of everyone unifying behind the candidate generating the most excitement with the best chance of winning against the other party candidate. In my 60 years these have always been intra-party contests, but these are different times. Party reformation has never played as large a role as it does now.

This year's election is a referendum on establishment politics itself. The pundits in both parties still fail to grasp this obvious fact.

The Republican party is starting to wake up. Their primary season has been an expensive disaster. Their tuberous outcropping of so many weak presidential candidates, all casting about for a winning message, was an obvious sign that the GOP itself is in critical condition. The establishment elites of that party have abused their privileged status for years. They have made too many cynical promises to voters, promises they never intended to keep. They applied deceptive marketing to arouse their base and garner favor with an electorate that they secretly despise. Once in office, they cynically sold themselves to big-business and big-money interests while tossing crumbs to the people who elected them.

Donald Trump is the toxic chemotherapy that party needs to kill the cancerous grip big organized money has on the Republican establishment. The message couldn't be any clearer. The Republican establishment has to go. The Trump candidacy, whether Trump wins or loses, will sweep many other establishment candidates out of office.

The Democratic party suffers from the same disease as the Republican party, but at an earlier stage. Party elites are caught in the death grip of powerful private interests. The will of their constituents has become secondary. Dwindling turnout over the past decade has been ignored as long as slick marketing techniques were still winning election.

But elections are not all about winning; they are ultimately about governing.

Money in the Democratic party isn't just a necessary evil any more. It is now a growing tumor. The people who really hear what Bernie Sanders is saying recognize that he is proposing a cure that might prevent this cancer from metastasizing. Meanwhile the establishment media still thinks this election is only about a fight for progressive ideas.

Given the state of the two parties, a Sanders win would be a foregone conclusion. All the polls say as much, yet this is message isn't seeping into the consciousness of the establishment. The Democratic party is eager to put Hillary's negatives up against Trump's negatives any day, in yet another hold-your-nose-and-vote election.

And, they would be right if this election was only based on ideology. But it isn't. It is a referendum on our political establishment. Not only will Hillary Clinton have disadvantages related to her high unfavorability, she will not win the support of youthful "movement" Democrats or disgruntled independents.

If the race is between Clinton and Trump it will be a race between an establishment and a non-establishment candidate. Given the anger and level of dissatisfaction around the country, all bets should be off as to how that contest might turn out.



Authors Website: http://www.aseyeseesit.blogspot.com

Authors Bio:

Brian Lynch is a retired social worker who worked in the areas of adult mental health and child protection for many years. His work brought him into direct contact with all the major social issues of the day and many of our basic social institutions such as law enforcement, schools, hospitals, welfare agencies and private social service providers on both a local and state levels.

This was a privileged vantage point for him to observe every level of human ecology, from the lives of individuals to the operations of government institutions. He was struck by the impact of state and federal policies on the lives of ordinary people, for better or worse. Political conflict and the clash of ideologies has real, observable and sometimes devastating consequences. He now writes and blogs on topics that relate to his social observations.


Back