| Back OpEdNews | |||||||
|
Original Content at https://www.opednews.com/articles/Two-Short-Paragraphs-that-by-Glenn-Greenwald-Human-Rights-Campaign_Human-Rights-Violations_Oppression_Political-150913-200.html (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher). |
|||||||
September 13, 2015
Two Short Paragraphs that Summarize the US Approach to Human Rights Advocacy
By Glenn Greenwald
What baffles me most about U.S. political discourse: how -- whenever it's time to introduce the next "humanitarian war" or other forms of attack against the latest Evil Dictator or Terrorist Group of the Moment -- so many otherwise intelligent and well-reasoning people are willing to believe that the U.S. Government is motivated by opposition to human rights abuses and oppression.
::::::::
In his excellent article on the unique guilt-by-association standard being imposed on newly elected Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, my colleague Jon Schwarz references a passage from a 2013 Washington Post article that I want to highlight because of how illuminating it is. That Post article describes the Obama administration's growing alliance with human-rights-abusing regimes in Africa, which allow the U.S. to expand its drone operations there, and contains this unusually blunt admission from a "senior U.S. official" (emphasis added):
"Human-rights groups have also accused the U.S. government of holding its tongue about political repression in Ethiopia, another key security partner in East Africa.
"'The countries that cooperate with us get at least a free pass,' acknowledged a senior U.S. official who specializes in Africa but spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid retribution. 'Whereas other countries that don't cooperate, we ream them as best we can.'"
The Post article went on to note that the Bush administration "took the same approach" and that while "many U.S. diplomats and human-rights groups had hoped Obama would shift his emphasis in Africa from security to democracy ... that has not happened." In fact, "'there's pretty much been no change at all,' the official said. 'In the end, it was an almost seamless transition from Bush to Obama.'"
The italicized portion of the quote explains the crux of feigned U.S. concerns for human rights abuses: it's never genuine, never anything more than a weapon cynically exploited to advance U.S. interests. The U.S. loves human-rights-abusing regimes and always has, provided they "cooperate": meaning, honors U.S. dictates. On human rights abuses, such compliant regimes "get at least a free pass": at least, meaning either passive acquiescence or active support. The only time the U.S. Government pretends to care in the slightest about human rights abuses is when they're carried out by "countries that don't cooperate," in which case those flamboyant objections to abuses are used by U.S. officials as punishment for disobedience: to "ream them as best we can."
Click Here to Read Whole Article
Authors Bio: