Obama's measly offer of a 95cent/hour raise to federal contract workers would leave them still earning $2.58 less in constant dollars than the minimum wage in 1968, writes TCBH! journalist Dave Lindorff

::::::::

By Dave Lindorff

President Obama, five years late, decried the terrible income gap in the US, which has worsened during his years in the White House, and offered the puny "fix" of raising the minimum wage paid to employees working on federal projects from its current $7.25 to $10.10 per hour. This executive order, which could have been done when he took office in the depths of the Great Recession back in 2009 would be not immediate but would be phased in over the next three years.

What a pathetic joke!

As the New York Times pointed out the next day in its report on the president's State of the Union speech, the "raise" by the president would only apply to "a few hundred thousand" workers.  If we assume that "few" to be 300,000 people, and that each of those people works a 40-hour week 50 weeks per year, that would mean that in the first year, when the incremental increase will be 95 cents/hour, each worker currently earning $7.25 per hour will earn an extra $1900, for a total gain by all the impacted workers of $570 million. 

Just to give a sense of how little $570 million is,  it works out to just over one-third of the  unit cost of one F-35 Joint Strike Fighter . That's the Pentagon's latest new fighter jet, designed and built by Lockheed-Martin, the one that has no enemy to fight and that is probably to flawed and too costly to ever risk in battle anyhow. 

What is really obscene about the president's token wage-increase gesture is that the $10.10 wage that he is saying the federal government will ultimately its contract workers in three years would, in constant dollars, still be less than what the federal minimum wage was back in 1968, almost half a century ago!

Even worse is the reality that we wouldn't even be talking about this pathetic offer, or about a current federal hourly wage of $7.25 if Obama, back in 2009, fresh off a huge election victory and with Democratic Party control of both houses of Congress, had honored his campaign pledge to re-establish fairness in the National Labor Relations Act by passing "card check" legislation, making it possible for workers to unionize their workplaces by simply having a majority of workers sign cards saying they wanted a union...

For the rest of this article by DAVE LINDORFF in ThisCantBeHappening!, the new uncompromising four-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative newspaper, please go to:  www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/2129

Authors Website: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net

Authors Bio:

Dave Lindorff, winner of a 2019 "Izzy" Award for Outstanding Independent Journalism from the Park Center for Independent Media in Ithaca, is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy" and "Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal"). His latest book, coauthored with Barbara Olshanshky, is "The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office (St. Martin's Press, May 2006).