| Back OpEdNews | |||||||
|
Original Content at https://www.opednews.com/articles/This-FAA-Sequester-Vote-Do-by-Jared-Bernstein-130429-996.html (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher). |
|||||||
April 29, 2013
This FAA Sequester Vote Doesn't Smell Right
By Jared Bernstein
Washington politicians always manage to take care of themselves & their funders while their efforts to serve the rest of us are a mixed blessing.
::::::::
Well, well. It appears that both the Senate and House have voted to end sequester-imposed furloughs of air traffic controllers, just in time for the weekend.
You choose: Is this bipartisan support to mitigate one of the noxious effects of sequestration, which I and others have been tracking? Or is it papering over the high-visibility stuff that affects the affluent while lots of other budget bleeding goes on beneath the radar?
I choose the latter. While the annoyance of flight delays caught the attention of elected officials, businesspeople and other frequent flyers, lots of other, less advantaged Americans will continue to feel the pain of the sequester due to cuts in a variety of programs.
My CBPP colleague Sharon Parrott outlined some of the people outside of airport security lines facing sequestration-induced hardships:
At least two Indiana Head Start programs have resorted to a random drawing to determine which three-dozen preschool students will be removed from the education program for low-income families, a move officials said was necessary to limit the impact of mandatory across-the-board federal spending cuts.
House Democrat Rick Larsen summed this up well in Politico yesterday: "...no 3- or 4-year-old is going to call my office and say, 'I've been kicked out of Head Start, replace that money.'"
I get hit by air delays a lot and I hate it. But this vote doesn't smell right. If this boneheaded approach to budgeting remains in place and policymakers continue to cherry pick which sequester-related problems they'll fix -- they'll be the ones that bug the public the most -- that means everything else will have to be cut back that much more. And that will inevitably be the stuff that matters most to the poor and unemployed, who lack the political voice, access, or visibility to stop the cuts.
Bin Appelbaum of the NYT got to the essence of the thing in a tweet: "Maybe unemployed people should try standing on runways." See you there...
This post originally appeared at Jared Bernstein's On The Economy blog & is crossposted at Huffington Post.
Follow Jared Bernstein on Twitter: www.twitter.com/econjared