Back OpEd News | |||||||
Original Content at https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-SEC-Appears-to-Be-Coll-by-Robert-Lightworker-120110-576.html (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher). |
January 11, 2012
The SEC Appears to Be Colluding with the Management of CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
By Robert Lightworker
In this article, I expose how the business as usual of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys creates an environment in which perpetrators are able to perpetrate their wrongdoing with impunity; furthermore they appear to be colluding with the CMKM management by agreeing not to file a complaint against it for its wrongdoing.
::::::::
The participation of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in political cronyism and crony capitalism and its practice of covering up for its indisputable gross negligence and seeming criminal complicity (hereinafter collectively referred to as "business as usual") creates an environment in which perpetrators are able to perpetrate their wrongdoings with impunity.
Pertaining to CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKM), business as usual of the SEC and its SEC Enforcement Division Attorneys, John M. McCoy, Molly M. White, and Leslie Hakala (hereinafter collectively referred to as "malfeasant SEC Attorneys"), allows Kevin West, off-and-on COB/CEO/President of CMKM Diamonds, Inc., (CMKM) , Mark Faulk, former CEO/President of CMKM, all other subsequent illegally-appointed officers of CMKM, and illegally-hired Bill Frizzell , current attorney for CMKM (hereinafter collectively referred to as "CMKM management") to operate CMKM without calling an annual shareholder meeting. By failing to call an annual shareholder meeting, the CMKM management breaches CMKM's bylaws, violates Texas Business Corporation Act, Article 2.24(B), and therefore is liable for mismanagement (hereinafter collectively referred to as "wrongdoing").
Even if CMKM management's wrongdoing does not fall within the purview of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys, they are still conducting business as usual for failing to refer CMKM management's wrongdoing to the appropriate governmental enforcement agencies.
What is even more disturbing is that the business as usual of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys indicates they are colluding with the CMKM management by agreeing not to file a complaint against it for its wrongdoing.
In return, the CMKM management agrees not to expose the business as usual of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys pertaining to the illegal naked short selling of CMKM's stock and numerous other issues.
The following flip-flop of the CMKM management pertaining to the illegal naked short selling of CMKM's stock points toward said collusion:
Before being appointed or hired to their respective positions with CMKM, the CMKM management advocates stock market reform in general and questions the business as usual of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys in particular regarding the illegal naked short selling of CMKM's stock.
Excerpts from three of Bill Frizzell's emails:
"We proved a huge naked short position in this company a long time ago."
"Our investigation reveals a potentially huge naked short position in at least two of the very companies that have sent us certs."
In his 1-6-06 SEC Deposition, Bill Frizzell testifies repeatedly under oath that CMKM was illegally naked shorted, pages 123, 149-151, 155, 164, and 167;
In his 6-1-06 article, "The CMKX Story: When Too Much Isn't Enough," Mark Faulk points out that brokerages give phony excuses for their failing to deliver stock certificates to CMKM shareholders.
In FAQ Session #s 1-4, 6, and 13-14 (8-10-07 to 6-1-08), the CMKM management pronounces that CMKM's being illegally naked shorted is no longer a primary concern; and furthermore, they cover up the illegal status of CMKM's naked short sales which denotes fraud, RICO, and punitive damages and replace it with the legal status of failures to deliver which merely denotes bookkeeping errors and the mere recovering of one's investment.
Because the flip-flop is so transparent, many CMKM shareholders are able to interpret it to mean that the CMKM management is colluding with the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys as evidenced by the following posts of CMKM shareholders in CMKM forums:
"It appears that the Tyler gang has been bought off...... could that be the case, Kevin?
"It is clear that you have signed some sort of settlement agreement in which you promised not to sue the bankers and brokers""
"So Mssrs Faulk, West, and Frizzell, you will all be guilty of criminal negligence if you do not get shareholders the compensation they deserve, for being victimized by the largest naked short in the history of Wall Street."
"Kevin, Mark" if you two turned to the darkside, we will be united in the things we do to the 2 of you....think you can't sleep at night now think about the nights after the truth comes out......"
In response to the business as usual of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys, I file the following complaints with the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) against the SEC and its malfeasant employees:
On 9-1-11, I file Complaint, Report #115612564 against the SEC and a malfeasant employee for their stonewalling my SEC Complaint, Case Number HO102219.
On 11-15-11, the OIG confirms that it has opened a preliminary inquiry into possible SEC staff misconduct pertaining to Complaint, Report #115612564.
On 9-2-11, I file Complaint, Report #115613986 against SEC and the SEC malfeasant Attorneys for their failure to comply with the demands listed in my 8-18-11 Petition Letter that I start on Change.org.
On 9-19-11, the OIG confirms that it has opened a preliminary inquiry into possible SEC staff misconduct pertaining to Complaint, Report #115613986.
On 1-5-12, I file with the OIG, Complaint, Report #116066995, against the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys for their supra business as usual that I expose in this article.
As of the date I submit this article, the OIG has not yet confirmed that it has opened a preliminary inquiry into possible SEC staff misconduct pertaining to Complaint, Report # 116066995.
Because CMKM shareholders are fed up with the business as usual of the SEC and its malfeasant SEC Attorneys, seven CMKM shareholders take matters into their own hands on 12-14-11 and file a Petition for Shareholder Meeting and Order for Inspection of Corporate Records, Cause No. 11-3417-A, against the CMKM management in the District Court of Smith County, Texas, 7th Judicial District, for its failure to call an annual shareholder meeting and for its failure to investigate a trust fund that has allegedly been set aside for CMKM shareholders; and then on 12-19-11, they file a Motion for Summary Judgment against the CMKM management.
My articles on OpEdNews substantiate a disturbing truism: The SEC is not a solution to the problem -- the SEC is the problem.
Now it is up to the OIG to hold the SEC and its malfeasant employees accountable for their business as usual.