Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Madison-a-Foretaste-of-Thi-by-Dave-Lindorff-110303-526.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

March 3, 2011

Madison a Foretaste of Things to Come: The Next Big Occupation Could be Boomers Taking Over the Capitol Building

By Dave Lindorff

The worker uprising in Madison WI has been inspiring, but the next big occupation may be when the new Boomer retirees take over the Capital building in DC to demand better Social Security benefits and Medicare for all.

::::::::

By Dave Lindorff

The dramatic occupation of the Wisconsin State House in Madison by angry public workers and their supporters over the past few weeks is an exciting preview of what we can expect to see in the halls of Congress before long, as right-wing forces, funded by corporate lobbies and corporate-funded think-tanks push hard for cutbacks in Social Security and Medicare.

This time the Madison Statehouse, Next time, the Capitol in DC?
This time the Madison Statehouse, Next time, the Capitol in DC?
(Image by ThisCantBeHappening)
  Details   DMCA

The drive to undermine these two critically important social programs is moving into high gear as the 79-million Baby Boomers this year start to reach eligibility, even as their other assets--their homes and their investment portfolios--are still shriveled by the Wall Street heist known as the "fiscal crisis" and Great Recession.

For years, the right has been gravely warning of the supposedly looming "bankruptcy" of Social Security and the even more imminent "bankruptcy" of Medicare, as though these twin disasters for the elderly were an actuarial imperative. In fact, both programs are political creations, whose problems have political causes and political solutions.

Social Security is starting to draw down the huge reserves it had built up, because the share of national income that is subject to the tax has fallen, from 90% back in the 1980s, to just 84% now as the wealthy have taken an increasingly large share of the total national income.  If more of the income of the rich were slapped with the FICA tax, to bring the total share of income taxed back to 90%, there would be plenty of money to pay promised benefits into the foreseeable future. The same can be said of Medicare. More taxes on the rich would ensure the funding of that program too.

There is no inherent reason why only the first $106,000 of a person's income should be subject to the FICA tax. It could be the first $200,000, or the first $500,000, and if it were the latter, we could be talking about improving benefits for retirees, not just preserving current levels. Benefits could be better still if investment income were no longer exempted from a FICA tax (and Medicare tax).

But here's the big point:  Corporate America, and its political lackeys in the Republican and Democratic Parties, know that they are about to confront a dramatically more powerful protagonist in their campaign to kill Social Security and Medicare: the Boomer Retirees...

For the rest of this article by DAVE LINDORFF in ThisCantBeHappening!, the new independent online alternative newspaper, please go to: www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/493



Authors Website: http://www.thiscantbehappening.net

Authors Bio:

Dave Lindorff, winner of a 2019 "Izzy" Award for Outstanding Independent Journalism from the Park Center for Independent Media in Ithaca, is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the Disintegration of American Democracy" and "Killing Time: An Investigation into the Death Penalty Case of Mumia Abu-Jamal"). His latest book, coauthored with Barbara Olshanshky, is "The Case for Impeachment: The Legal Argument for Removing President George W. Bush from Office (St. Martin's Press, May 2006).


Back