Back   OpEd News
Font
PageWidth
Original Content at
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Republicans-Issue-Easy-To-by-George-Faulkner-091106-412.html
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

November 7, 2009

Republicans Issue Easy-To-Read Health Care Reform Bill (the “Pat the Insurance Companies Act”)

By George Faulkner

A Handy Summary of the Republican Health Care Reform Bill (satire)

::::::::

Conservatives, overwhelmed by the 2000-page House bill drafted by the Democrats, countered with a simple, 230-page bill (complete with common-sense illustrations on every page), called the “Pat the Insurance Companies Act of 2009, or Whenever.” The bill required many months of careful drafting by insurance agents and CEOs, along with high tax-bracket experts from the Nero Institute. Its list of large-font bullet points includes extending the tax protections of health savings accounts to hundreds of desperate high-income earners, faced with elimination of the Bush tax cuts.

To simplify compliance and preserve the fragile status of those with sufficient common sense to be currently insured, the bill contains no mandates, incentives, or regulations of any sort.

Here are some of the highlights (in fact, this is pretty much it):

Section 1:

“See Dick Armey feeling for the uninsured. Now you try to feel for the uninsured!”

For those who were too thoughtless or lazy to become sick and uninsured (i.e., unemployed), this section of the bill (entitled, “Extending Access To the Untouchables”) promotes high risk pools, where they can either sick or swim.

Section 2:

“See Michele Bachmann put her finger through the loopholes. Now why don't you try to put your finger through the loopholes!”

This section (entitled, “Crossing Stately Lions for Immortal Porpoises”) encourages insurance companies to file their plans in the state with the least regulations, so that they need not cover extras like maternity cases, cancer treatments, and crutches (which after all are merely crutches). However, the fine print in their policies must at least be in a size 2 font. Texas Governor Rick Perry and Alaska's governor Sarah Palin reported are looking forward to this exciting “race to the bottom.”

Section 3:

“See Newt Gingrich connect the dots. Now you try to connect the dots!”

The bill includes financing for technology expert, Newt Gingrich, to set up a web site to enable those who can afford coverage to be able to simply compare all 1,300 insurance companies, with each of their 20-plus variations of plan designs. The web site will allow patriotic English-speaking, native born Americans of all stripes to easily compare co-pays; per-admission and per year deductibles; coinsurances, in-network and out-of-network provisions; daily, per admission, per-episode of treatment, and per visit maximums; out-of-pocket limits, coverage exclusions and limitations, termination provisions, premiums, enrollment requirements, generalist and specialist provider networks, and insurance company solvency ratings.

Section 4:

“See Michael Steele kiss up to seniors. Now you try to appease up to seniors.”

While the Republicans did not vote for Medicare and have tried to eliminate the program several times in the past, the new bill preserves the current fee-for-all provider payment structure, utilization and cost variation around the country, and inherent cost enhancement trends for frequently voting seniors. It also continues the 14% average extra payments to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, so that their executives and shareholders can afford to maintain their own health care coverage. There is no guarantee, however, that future seniors will have a Medicare trust fund. Anyway, their health savings accounts, invested in quality mutual funds and stocks, should be able to cover whatever medical care they will need in their golden years.

Section 5:

“See John Boehner scratch the surface on malpractice reform. Now you can scratch the surface on malpractice reform!”

The bill would reduce malpractice insurance costs and frivolous malpractice suits by limiting awards to 250,000 frequent flyer miles on Alaska Airlines, usable between the months of October and April. It would also limit the number of billboards featuring ads for attorneys to 1 per mile along federal highways.

The Congressional Budget Office issued a preliminary scoring of the bill during lunch on November 4th on the back of a napkin in the House cafeteria. The CBO analysis indicated that the bill would go a long way towards reducing the uninsured by 1% point (3 million people) over the next ten years. Unfortunately, due to population growth, the actual number of uninsured would increase to 52 million (including 35 million “real Americans”). Meanwhile, the bill reduce the federal deficit by a whopping $68 billion over ten years, or about $7 billion a year, or half of what those big-spending Democrats would save. By comparison, the federal government and states now spend about a trillion dollars per year on Medicare and Medicaid. So saving $7 billion a year is quite a feat – 7/10ths of 1%! Not coincidentally, the Senate Republicans will soon be coming out with their companion bill, entitled the “Goodnight, Medicare Act of 2009, or Whenever.”



Authors Bio:
I retired at the beginning of 2009 from consulting in employee benefits (health care, disability, time-off policies, health management programs, financial analysis, survey analysis). During my career, I've written, spoken at many national conferences, and been interviewed by national and local media on the above topics. During the early 1990s, I wrote about the impact of health care reform on employers and developed a financial impact model to assess the impact of various proposals before Congress on employers. Through this work, I helped several large employers lobby in favor of health care reform in 1993-94.

My other (totally unrelated) "hobby" is studying the interaction between religion and science and principles common to all major religions. My perspective is closest to religious naturalism (vs. supernaturalism) and, to some extent, the ideas of Ken Wilber, Michael Dowd, biologist Ursula Goodenough, and others.

Back