Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 4 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (6 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   31 comments

Should secular people actively oppose religious superstition and extremism?

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Don Smith     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/24/11

Become a Fan
  (23 fans)

Should secular people actively oppose religious superstition and extremism?

    Freedom of religion and tolerance for diversity are fundamental principles of American democracy. Believers have the Constitutionally-guaranteed rights to follow and proselytize their religious convictions.  

On the other hand, non-believers have the similar rights to follow and promote their secular beliefs, don't they?  Freedom of religion and tolerance should not be used as justification for stifling honest, open discussion. 

Religious extremism and superstition distort our politics and harm society.   On issues such as militarism, women's rights, gay rights, gun control, taxation, climate change, and the dismantling of the social safety net, fundamentalist Christians have allied themselves with the Republican Party.  Fundamentalists have promoted anti-scientific theories such as Creationism and have spread the idea that America was founded as a "Christian nation" -- a view at odds with the historical record.

But is religious belief specially protected?  Even if, constitutionally, secular people are allowed to oppose religious beliefs, it may be the case that doing so is immoral or divisive or strategically unwise.  And we need to be careful not to lump extremist views with harmless or beneficial moderate views.

Should secular people work actively to refute and, where appropriate, condemn religious beliefs? 

Yes, fundamentalists believe ridiculous things and promote regressive policies.
       73% from 66 votes  
No, religious speech is specially protected.
       8% from 7 votes  
No, the effort would likely backfire and would be politically and morally unwise.
       14% from 13 votes  
Not sure, or other. (Please explain in comments.)
       4% from 4 votes  

    90 votes    Vote               View Demographics Cross-Tab Results

Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote: Tell A Friend


Share This Poll

You can publish this poll on your blog or website. To embed a poll, just copy the code from this "Embed" box. Once you've copied the code, just paste it into your website or blog to embed it.

Embed: Customize
<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.opednews.com/populum/poll_api.php?pid=578&layout=default"></script>


- Advertisement -

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It


DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -