Should secular people actively oppose religious superstition and extremism?
Freedom of religion and tolerance for diversity are fundamental principles of American democracy. Believers have the Constitutionally-guaranteed rights to follow and proselytize their religious convictions.
On the other hand, non-believers have the similar rights to follow and promote their
secular beliefs, don't they? Freedom of religion and tolerance should not be used
as justification for stifling honest, open discussion. Religious extremism and superstition distort our politics and harm
society. On issues such as militarism, women's rights, gay rights, gun
control, taxation, climate change, and the dismantling of the social safety net,
fundamentalist Christians have allied themselves with the Republican
Party. Fundamentalists have promoted anti-scientific theories such as
Creationism and have spread the idea that America was founded as a "Christian
nation" -- a view at odds with the historical record. But is religious belief specially protected? Even if, constitutionally, secular people are allowed to oppose
religious beliefs, it may be the case that doing so is immoral or
divisive or strategically unwise. And we need to be careful not to lump extremist views with harmless or beneficial moderate views. Should secular people work actively to refute and, where appropriate, condemn religious beliefs?
Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote:
View All Polls
Share This Poll
You can publish this poll on your blog or website. To embed a poll, just copy the code from this "Embed" box.
Once you've copied the code, just paste it into your website or blog to embed it.
DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.