Should Rev. Terry Jones be charged for the crime of reckless endangerment?
Reckless endangerment is defined as a crime by a
person recklessly engaging in conduct which creates a substantial risk of
serious physical injury to another person. Reckless conduct is conduct that
exhibits a culpable disregard of foreseeable consequences to others from the
act or omission involved. The accused need not intentionally cause a resulting
harm or know that his conduct is substantially certain to cause that result.
The ultimate question is whether, under all the circumstances, the accused's
conduct was of that heedless nature that made it actually or imminently
dangerous to the rights or safety of others.
Given that Rev. Terry Jones had been warned that burning a copy of the Quran (Islam's holy book) would result in harm to others and that, under his own admission, bburned a Quran as part of a public protest, should he be charged with the crime of reckless endangerment?
I agree that Rev. Terry Jones should be charged with reckless endangerment
62% from 24 votes
Rev. Terry Jones was exercising his right to free speech and as such should not be charged 38% from 15 votes
39 votes Vote
View Demographics Cross-Tab Results
Invite Your Friend(s) to Vote:
Share This Poll
You can publish this poll on your blog or website. To embed a poll, just copy the code from this "Embed" box.
Once you've copied the code, just paste it into your website or blog to embed it.
Rev. Dan Vojir is has been writing/blogging on religion and politics for the better part of ten years. A former radio talk show host (Strictly Books €" Talk America Radio Network) and book publisher, Dan has connected with some of the most (
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.