Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
OpEdNews Op Eds

Wikileaks responds to Bank Julius Baer lies

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Stephen Soldz       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 80
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -

In the battle against the totally unprecedented judicial censorship of the entire Wikileaks.org web site, Wikileaks (still available at Wikileaks.be) has issued an editorial rebutting a number of false claims (i.e., lies) contained in press release issued by Bank Julius Baer & Trust, the bank that asked the judge to shut Wikileaks.org down. (Fortunately, the bank, in initiating this action, has caused itself enormous damage):

Wikileaks blasts Cayman Islands bank

Bank Julius Baer & Trust -- the Swiss-Cayman "private banking" entity currently attempting to sue Wikileaks before US Federal court Justice Jeffery White in San Francisco today released a press release onto the "Business Wire" vanity wire service. The press release was subsequently picked up by Reuters and other wire services.

Wikileaks responds.

- Advertisement -

Bank Julies Baer & Trust, from here on in, simply referred to as Baer, claimed in relation to Wikileaks:

"It wasn't our intention to shut down the Web site".

This is a lie.

Baer's requests to the court to do just that are a matter of public record. The only change made by Judge Jeffery White to Baer's proposed "Wikileaks.org' takedown order was to cross out the word 'proposed'! Baer also wrote-for-the-judge a separate order in relation to the documents alone, which was similarly granted. Further, at any time subsequent Baer could have asked the court that its earlier request on the shutdown order be rescinded. It has not done so. While one might be tempted to blame the bank's Hollywood lawyers Lavely & Singer for running amuck, Baer continues to employ the same law firm. This can only be seen as an endorsement of its conduct.

- Advertisement -

Baer claimed that:

"This decision was arrived at only after a month long effort on the part of Julius Baer.. to engage the operators of Wikileaks in a dialogue.."

This is a lie.

Wikileaks responded with grace and speed to every one of Baer's highly irregular (see below) demands and left communication open. A full record is available as:

http://Wikileaks.be/wiki/Full_correspondence_between_Wikileaks_and_Bank_Julius_Baer

The last letter is from Wikileaks. The entire correspondence covers a period of two days. Baer did not submit the correspondence to the court for hearing although it was absolutely central to the issues and Wikileaks was not represented. A clear abuse of process.

Wikileaks is confident about its place in the court of public opinion, but the shadowy Swiss-Cayman "Bank and Trust" Baer, has been allergic to the sun from the very beginning. The first sign of this hyper-sensitivity to light was when its lawyers, Lavely & Singer refused to put their demands in writing -- even email -- as requested. The second sign was when the same lawyers refused to even identify their client!

Finally Baer's (as it turned out) lawyers refused to even state what city they would be taking their threatened action in so Wikileaks could arrange representation in that city, instead preferring to abuse process and arrange a hearing where Wikileaks was not represented. But don't take our word for it -- see the submissions to the court by our then pre-litigation council Julie Turner and:

- Advertisement -
http://Wikileaks.be/wiki/Full_correspondence_between_Wikileaks_and_Bank_Julius_Baer
http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Bank_Julius_Baer_vs._Wikileaks

It is Baer who decided to hire Hollywood lawyers Lavely & Singer, who like to describe themselves as "all-around bad cop for stars from Bruce Willis and Arnold Schwarzenegger to Jim Carrey and Celine Dion.". It is Baer who stood by these lawyers while they abused process with the assistance of negligent Bush appointed Federal Judge. It is Baer who has refused to make amends for its misdeeds and it is Baer who is now suffering, and will continue to suffer the consequences.

Baer "has form" in engaging in quasi-criminal conduct not just in relation to offshore banking asset hiding. The Swiss court records reveal Baer hired Zurich-based private detectives Ryffel AG to engage in car chases down the streets of Zurich of the person Baer claims is the whistleblower concerned -- including while the alleged whistleblower took his daughters to primary school. The police apprehended one of the chases which then because a matter of public record in a Dec 2007 case in Switzerland as did Baer's attempts to bribe the suspected whistleblower into keeping quiet. See:

http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Rudolf_Elmer_vs._Bank_Julius_Baer
http://wikileaks.be/wiki/Clouds_on_the_Cayman_tax_heaven (Wikileaks story)

Baer claimed that:

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Stephen Soldz is psychoanalyst, psychologist, public health researcher, and faculty member at the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis. He is co-founder of the Coalition for an Ethical Psychology and is President of Psychologists for Social Responsibility. He was a psychological consultant on two of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Torture Career of Egypt's New Vice President: Omar Suleiman and the Rendition to Torture Program

The Sex Lives and Sexual Frustrations of US troops in Iraq

Letter to Senate Intelligence Committee: Psychologists out of Abusive Interrogations

Veteran Army Interrogators: Torture doesn't work. Torture is wrong. Torture helps the enemy.

'Sleep deprivation': Euphemism and CIA torture of choice