Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Rulers Are Terrorists, Not The Poor

By       Message Muhammad Khurshid     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 1343
Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
- Advertisement -

The events in Pakistan during last few days have proved one thing, that the rulers are terrorists, not the poor people.

The poor people are actually the victims of terrorism by the rulers. Now their real faces have been exposed to the world.

- Advertisement -
An editorial of a leading newspaper discussed the situation in detail. The editorial exposed the ugly faces of the rulers. It stated that the Election Commissioner (EC) under Justice (Retd) Qazi Farooque accepted the nomination papers filed by President General Pervez Musharraf. This was followed by a violent clash between a clutch of protestors from the lawyers' community and a handful of opposition politicians on one side and contingents of the police in uniform and plain clothes on the other. Ominously, Pakistan once again proved true the observation that all "decisions" - electoral or judicial - tend to result in disorder rather than the pacification known in other normally functional states.

Retired judges and prominent lawyers led the protest march on the Election Commission, promising that their presence outside the EC office would be peaceful "unless provoked by government action against them". Earlier, the lawyers had clearly expressed their unhappiness over the Supreme Court verdict by rejecting the petitions filed against the re-election of President Pervez Musharraf. Most opposition politicians too had echoed their objection, saying that the Supreme Court had become "independent" in April but had now decided to become "enslaved" to the Doctrine of Necessity in September.

Their joint strategy was to challenge the papers of President Musharraf on the day of scrutiny of papers and then challenge the EC if it accepted his nomination. But the march to the EC was supposed to be peaceful. In anticipation of their attempt to forcibly enter the election commissioner's office, however, the police had cordoned the office off. But the lawyers weren't ready to accept that. Unfortunately, too, on the side of the lawyers there were clear words of provocation pronounced by some of their leaders, especially the firebrand vice chairman of the Pakistan Bar Council, Mr Ali Ahmad Kurd, who is well known in the country by now as an intemperate man. As if to confirm the police's worst apprehensions, he had pledged that the lawyers would enter the Election Commission and tear up the nomination papers of President Musharraf. Unfortunately, but not unsurprisingly, he was among those who received the brunt of the lathi-charge by an alarmed and edgy police force.

Violence amid mutual pelting of stones was also perpetrated on prominent lawyers and PPP leader, Mr Aitzaz Ahsan, and some members of other political parties. Since the media were in the thick of the action, they too got it in the neck. Several cameras were broken and some heads were opened up. The state minister of information, Tariq Azim, helped one injured journalist to the hospital but when he returned, he was attacked by angry journalists.

- Advertisement -
The general opposition to President Musharraf has little faith in the Supreme Court now. On the other hand, the government is morally much better armed after the verdict to face those who want to bring it down through protest. The opposition now expects the Pakistani public - "160 million waiting for justice" - to count the judiciary too among the anti-democratic forces that they have to fight. The respect that the judiciary had achieved over many months, since 2004 when it began its "suo moto" phase, was enhanced by the opposition and the lawyers from March to July this year. But now they want the people to believe just the opposite.

Meanwhile, the TV channels who "went to the people" to confirm their position on the re-election of President Musharraf encountered the following response. The people did not say that they wanted him out to regain democratic norms; nor did they pronounce on the need to transform the judiciary into an independent institution. All those interviewed in the streets wanted him out because of inflation and the spiralling prices of food items in the country. This leads us to a moral polarity that will surely be bad for the country. The government feels morally fortified by the Supreme Court verdict; the opposition is leaning for its moral support on the consensus of the political parties and an economically pressured population.

The violence seen in front of the Election Commission is bound to exacerbate the political situation in the country. When the opposition goes back to the Supreme Court to challenge the EC, the atmosphere will be greatly charged. So far the honourable court has avoided pronouncing on the merits of the cases brought before it; now it will be asked to pronounce a clear stance on the petition. Already, politicians are unfairly pointing to the Punjabi-non-Punjabi split among the 9-member bench. It is feared that "non-compliance" of the orders of the Supreme Court, initiated by the government in the matter of the return of the PMLN leader Mr Nawaz Sharif, will now spread to the opposition too.

There are "three streams" of opposition to President Musharraf in Pakistan. The political parties are arrayed against him partly because of his inability to negotiate with them. The lawyers' community wants to use his "moment of weakness" to correct the balance between the military and civilian forces in the country. The third stream is the process of Talibanisation under Al Qaeda that is gradually undermining the ability of the state to enforce its writ. Unfortunately, all three streams are feeding upon one another despite their clearly separate agendas. As the post-verdict disorder spreads, violence might take the upper hand. There are far too many elements in Pakistan today willing to resort to violence. And that doesn't bode well for governance either under the current incumbent party or any other that might follow it.
The End

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Muhammad Khurshid, a resident of Bajaur Agency, tribal areas situated on Pak-Afghan border is journalist by profession. He contributes articles and news stories to various online and print newspapers. His subject matter is terrorism. He is also (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Indo-Pak Tension Affecting War On Terror Badly

Public Execution By Taliban Increases Terror In Tribal Areas

Is Osama Alive Or Really Dead?

Obama Doing Well On The Foreign Front

US, Pakistan Heading Toward A Complete War