George Bush again has said he 'll be "judged by history. " How convenient. This means that he isn 't judging himself. In other words, he 's sleeping great. There 's no self examination. No making amends. But what exactly does it mean when someone who makes decisions of epic proportion leaves the onus of verdict to history? What is history and when does it begin? Is it there ready to evaluate soon after a decision is made, acted on, almost immediately after the results of that choice are known? Or does history wait to wield its hammer after a president is out of office? Richard Nixon received the blow before his presidency was supposed to expire. Certainly, George W. Bush should face a world jury for crimes that would have the signers of our Constitution spinning in their graves. How long do we have to wait for history to determine the failure of this man?
|The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.