Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

"Philosophical differences"

By       Message Mickey Z.     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Author 54
Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
When the FBI arrested several members (sic) of the Earth Liberation Front (ELF) in early 2006, it came as no surprise that much of the corporate media rejoiced. A fine example is an editorial that appeared in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer at the time. The ELF's alleged actions, the editors pronounced, challenged "society's ability to conduct itself peacefully" and demonstrated "arrogant, vicious thinking." Most notable is this declaration: "There's no philosophical difference between approving the torching of a large new home on Camano Island or the targeting of the tallest towers in Manhattan."

For the sake of argument, let's assume the Seattle Post-Intelligencer is correct in all of the above statements. What then, is the "philosophical difference" between the targeting of the tallest towers in Manhattan and the dropping of white phosphorous on babies in Iraq and why isn't the corporate media setting aside space to ponder that question? Much is made of FBI claims that the ELF and ALF (Animal Liberation Front) represent the greatest domestic threat today but in the land that never apologizes, anything goes in the name of waging war on a tactic (terror).

Bringing it closer to home, one can only wonder if the Seattle Post-Intelligencer perceives factory farming as a challenge to "society's ability to conduct itself peacefully"? Do the editors believe the morally bankrupt and scientifically fraudulent institution of animal experimentation demonstrates "arrogant, vicious thinking" or is such a label reserved only for official enemies?

Some will support ELF methods while others will strongly denounce them. In order to make such a determination, however, we need facts not hyperbole and fortunately, not all corporate media outlets issued a blanket condemnation of the ELF. Dean Schabner of explained that the "majority of the postings on the ELF Web site have maintained a commitment to avoiding injury to people, even those responsible for the projects they oppose." Schabner added: "They believe that the damage being done to the Earth by pollution, logging, mining and development must be stopped or the planet is doomed. They hope that by destroying property they can inflict enough financial damage on companies and individuals to make them stop their environmentally harmful practices."

Whether we agree or disagree with the ELF mission and/or tactics, at least offered a more rounded description of the leaderless group. In an informed society, this is precisely how citizens can form educated opinions.

Mickey Z. is the author of several books, most recently "50 American Revolutions You're Not Supposed to Know" (Disinformation Books). He can be found on the Web at


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It
Mickey Z. can be found on the Web at

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Five reasons why Americans won't resist

The Topic of Cancer

"We need to stop this culture before it kills the planet": A conversation with Derrick Jensen

Myth America: A Stand-up Tragedy

Porn and the CIA (Your tax dollars at work)

Downsize or Modify? A Conversation with Noam Chomsky