MEMPHIS, Tenn. – One thousand leaders of the nation’s labor movement, gathered here for the AFL-CIO’s Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday Observance, launched a drive Jan. 18 to “take back the country” in the 2008 elections.
Heeding King’s 1961 declaration that “the vote is our most powerful weapon,” labor and civil rights leaders mapped plans and held training sessions to arm trade unionists with tools they hope will elect a pro-worker president, larger pro-labor majorities in the Senate and the House, pro-labor governors and hundreds of progressives in state legislative bodies. Observers called it the most ambitious election effort ever by labor and its allies.
“Dr. King would indeed be proud if he could see the field of the main Democratic contenders for the presidency, a woman, an African American, and a white male who opened his campaign for the job in the Lower Ninth Ward of New Orleans,” Walters declared as delegates rose to their feet and cheered.
“As always, we must keep the issues on the front burner,” he said, “but I think we can live with any of these three candidates and when could we ever say that before about all the possible nominees of one of the big parties?”
Also fueling the determination of labor and civil rights leaders to focus on the elections is the dismal record of the Bush administration which was emphasized by speaker after speaker at the King commemoration. Included on the list of “Bush disasters” were 4,000 dead American soldiers in Iraq, first the lack of and then the wrong response to Hurricane Katrina, the obscene and growing income gap between rich and poor, and use of the National Labor Relations Board, which was intended to protect union organizers to instead destroy organizing rights.
A major focus by labor on the elections is giving Republicans cause to be fearful.
AFL-CIO figures discussed at the King commemoration show that in 2004 the Democrat, John Kerry, lost to Bush by just 135,000 votes, a razor thin margin. If the trade union vote were subtracted from the 2004 totals the vote would not have been close at all. Kerry would have carried only Washington, Maine, Vermont and Connecticut.
Dr. King’s commitment to labor rights in America and around the world actually began long before the 1968 sanitation workers’ strike here when he was assassinated. His Dec. 11, 1961, declaration that “Our needs are identical with labor’s needs” was invoked here by several speakers who called for continuation of the “historical unity” of the labor and civil rights movements. That unity, they stressed, will make the 2008 election plan realizable.
In addition to electing a pro-worker president, the AFL-CIO announced here Jan. 18 that it will increase the pro-labor majority in the Senate by targeting 17 states where it believes progressives can be elected. The states on this list are Maine, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Florida, Michigan, Wisconsin, Missouri, Iowa, Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington and Alaska.
Labor will add to that list three states, Alabama, Nebraska, and South Dakota, in which it believes it can elect pro-worker governors.
Anti-labor forces are responding by trying to divert some of labor’s time and efforts. Labor leaders in the relevant states were called together in groups in Memphis to study these right wing initiatives and to map plans to defeat them. The anti-labor efforts are coming in the form of “right to work,” “paycheck deception” and “anti-affirmative action” initiatives in Oregon, Colorado, Missouri, and Michigan. Unionists in Memphis were confident they could defeat all of the right wing initiatives.
Also included in the planning were Congressional seats. Unionists in Memphis mapped plans to take 68 additional seats in Congress, which would create a large pro-worker majority in the House.
In state legislatures across the country they targeted 200 state legislative seats. “Labor, when all is told,” Ackerman said, “will be mobilizing 15 million union voters in 528 races across the country.”