Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

"Off the Paper Trail" and finding ourselves on our own "Trail of Tears"

By John Ervin  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   1 comment
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
"Off the paper trail" ~~ and finding ourselves on our own "Trail of Tears"

This is written as a response and appreciation for Mark Crispin Miller's recent post, "Let's get off the paper trail." ( Miller is the author of "Fooled Again" a post-mortem of the many and multi-tiered crimes of our 2004 Presidential "Election," with its cast of thousands, most of them criminals ). Miller's article in itself was a response to Michael Scherer's piece, about "taking the paper trail to Washington," at, and both can be found at the following link at Smirking Chimp:

Hoping to follow Miller's fine advice in his post, to "get off the paper trail," I will do so ~~ and we will wind up taking an unexpected detour. After considering his cautionary point, I will ask for your company, especially, as we strike out on quite another trail altogether: one that I find leads to a yet darker place in our collective (and real) history. I will do my best to trim it with our hopes.

But, that trail, winding as it does out of our distant national past, into the present day, can be clearly discerned in these times as bleeding into our very own "Trail of Tears." And it has a deep and causal relationship to our current and unremedied electoral malaise.

But let's first reprise Miller's pithy diagnosis of the current "reforms" of the Holt Bill:

"....We have heard it argued that the Holt bill is a half-step in the right
direction, and that some reform is surely preferable to none at all. In
this case that's a dangerous self-delusion. Sometimes "compromise" can
only make things worse, as there really is no valid "middle way." So it
is with torture, and illegal wars. Whatever "compromise" serves merely
to protract such horrors is finally nothing but abetment, however
well-intended it may be...."

Miller points out ~ correctly, to be blunt with an opinion ( the death agony of our democracy is really not the time for niceties ) ~ that adding paper trails to voting machines is no sure defense, if at all, against these hackable electronic Trojan Horses: DREs ( Direct Recording Electronic voting machines, i.e., without any "hard copy;" the majority of our polls now have these gizmos, without any sure way to confirm what's gone on inside the "black boxes" ). In pointed fact: paper trails, when merely appended to these obscure gadgets ( more or less as an afterthought ~ or perhaps as an appeasement of the "Stepford Chapter" of voting reform activists: those who will "go gently into that good night" of black box voting, too easily content with meaningless "reform" ) are really no defense of our voting rights, at all. And the Holt Bill ~ which presents itself as a compromise ~ a band aid, really, for our deeply stricken democracy ~ is flimsy enough to warrant a charge of collusion with the enemy, as always is the case with such Vichy "compromises" with unacceptable criminal assault against a people, a public. ( Think: Neville Chamberlain returning to England after pressing the flesh with Hitler, and his widely trumpeted motto, "Peace in Our Time!" ~ if some apt parallel is required ). And the assault upon our democratic voting processes, carried out by Congress, is deeply and wittingly criminal.

Such absence of any spine in the "reform," and the same absence among our "representatives," merely "enables" the pirates of our voting rights to continue their piracies, in other ways, new or old, blunt or sly, on the same or some other High Seas ~ be they the far reaches of Cyberspace, or vulnerable software, or optical scanners such as have been used since well over forty years ( rendering purely suspect the results of all our elections that far back, and beyond ). This is true of any and all of the useless, if fancy, machinery that interposes itself between "we the people" and simple paper.

Simple paper. And that is ALL that we need to record a true vote ( with indelible ink, not evaporative kilobytes ) and a credible vote ~ one that can render a witnessed, public, and accurate count ~ and a provable account, or a needed recount. The vote, itself. The vote, in full. ( Some of these machines have even been sent software "patches" in past important American "elections" by "programmers" who merely "phone them in," downloading them wirelessly from cell-phones, even from outside our country ~ many of these shady "voting techs" without citizenship as Americans, but with long criminal records nonetheless. These "patches," once downloaded, have the capability to "cannibalize" themselves, disappearing without any trace. More importantly: changing the results. The very vote counts themselves. Bev Harris, of, detailed these methods, these facts, in early 2004 on "Coast to Coast AM" before a national audience, and many times since. This morning I received an email from Pokey Anderson informing our online groups that she has just a new article, the results of her own year and a half investigation of these aspects of wireless telecom voting fraud, titled "Even a Remote Chance?" So look for that, and further clues to these well hidden crimes. )

What Mark Crispin Miller says about the "electoral reform" parody going on apace in Washington these days, as reported in Scherer's article, is nicely pointed and telling:

"Now, we must ask ourselves: Would that movement be frustrated, its agenda thwarted, by the use of paper trails? Evidently not--since members of that very movement also back the Holt bill with enthusiasm. As the Salon piece points out, Mary Kiffmeyer, Minnesota's Secretary of State, has now testified in favor of the bill. It is more than relevant to note that Kiffmeyer is a stalwart Bushevik and theocratic maniac, who has publicly deplored the separation of church and state, and who did everything she could to slash the Democratic vote in Minnesota in the last election. (That appalling story is in Fooled Again, pp. 138-39.) Her record is so dismal that she's now in trouble, facing a strong challenge by Mark Ritchie, who knows full well what she has done to the electoral system in his state and means to change the situation. That such an operative as she--and David Cole, and John Groh of ES&S, and other Bushist agents--would support this measure tells us all we need to know about its usefulness......

....And so it is with the far-right crusade against American democracy. We must oppose that drive in every way we can--and that means not allowing its own managers to cast themselves as champions of electoral "reform."

Well, that has been our slogan as well for some time now, "Fake reform always trumps true reform, wherever the spirit of reform is absent." In fact, it is in one form or another a tagline and mantra of everyone in the voting protection movement, all of us who understand the how and why of this long prevalence of theft of the United States' vote, one greatly accelerating in the past several elections: "Nothing delays or derails true reform more effectively than fake reform." ( In fact, given the disingenousness, and bulging bank accounts ~of these DC "reformers" especially~ "fake reform" is a more correct phrase than "weak reform." When a reform is premeditatedly "weak," it's fake, more than it is weak. That is a key clue, and evidence of this ongoing conspiracy.

Another key clue: many of these self-styled "reformers" are among the greatest culprits ~and beneficiaries~ of rigged elections ( and we can well recall Jeb Bush and Katherine Harris among the first to hold a joint press conference, only some months after the 2000 Florida election meltdown, and the trotting out of their own trojan horses ~ disguised as voting machines ~ for us all to gape at, as their offering of "cures" for chads and what ails democracy.... Caveat emptor !! ) Senator Chuck Hagel has become a major player on The Hill; he himself has had past part ownership of Omaha's ES&S voting machine company, it is now counting 60% of the American vote (electronically, evaporatively). In fact, that's how he was first elected, as a package deal: senatorial candidate, and a key cog at ES&S. He went from trailing overwhelmingingly, at the start of his first successful campaign, to a stunning victory. Etc. ( Frank Carlucci ~ Reagan's Secretary of Defense, Princeton room-mate of Donald Rumsfeld, and business partner of Old Man Bush ~ sits on the advisory board of Populex, the company that now "handles" the Illinois vote. Other such members of this exclusive club "handling" our democracy are too numerous for the scope of this piece, but can be found on links to "voting company ownership" at Lynn Landes' home page of )

As in past Mexican "elections," so often notoriously rigged to produce the desired criminal result, the clear link we have to banana republicanism now can be found in how many of our representatives would not even be holding office, but for the clear presence of such large-scale counterfeiting rings, busily fabricating OUR vote. And, most importantly of all, there would not be these decisive majorities now in all branches of our governments, all of them favoring large corporate interests, without these counterfeiters.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend