Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Oil and Investment Banks: Wrecking economies with hedge funds

By       (Page 1 of 6 pages)   8 comments

I've been blitzed with stories all week about what is driving oil to $135 per barrel. Most of what I've seen are soundbites and short blurbs from the talking heads known as pundits. Numbers are rare, making it hard to discern fact from fiction. In this case, there seem to be three prevailing theories: The first is that supply is failing to meet demand, or will in the near future. The second theory is that a weak dollar buys less oil. The third is that speculation in oil futures have rendered supply and demand less relevant.


One thing in particular from a short Reuters article caught my attention: "Crude oil prices rocketed to record highs above 135 dollars on Thursday, driven by growing concerns that energy supplies will fail to meet demand, analysts said." (emphasis mine)


Those four words - "driven by growing concerns" - are enough to convince me that speculation is playing some role in rising oil prices. Markets are often driven by rumor, and like all rumors, there's usually little substance to the ones that sway markets. The question then becomes how much substance is there behind these "growing concerns" of an energy crunch?


Supply/Demand & Peak Oil


On May 22, the Treasury and Energy Secretaries both publicly stated they believe rising oil prices are being caused by supply problems. The House of Representatives passed a bill two days earlier to sue OPEC for limiting supplies and price setting. Goldmann Sachs predicted on May 5 that prices could reach $200 per barrel over the next two years.


I've been all over the Energy Information Administration's site and can tell you with confidence: There is no shortage of oil! There isn't expected to be a shortage of oil in either the short- or long-term, according to EIA predictions. In their May 2008 Short Term Energy Outlook, consumption is projected to go down in the US for 2008, and both national and global inventories are expected to grow as supply is (barely) meeting demand through 2009. The long term outlook, as stated in their 2007 International Energy Outlook, says, "In the high price case, oil prices are projected to be $100 per barrel in 2030 ($157 per barrel on a nominal basis)." In fact, the supply/demand picture looks good enough that a law was just signed to halt shipments of oil to the national reserve, which is 97% full.


The theory of peak oil is being thrown around as well. I admit to not being an expert on the subject, but as I understand it, this is the idea that we'll have a Malthusian catastrophe because our dependence on oil wasn't mitigated twenty years before peak production. However, there's little agreement on when peak production occurred - or if it even has yet. The reasoning and logic behind this theory seem flawed to me. It requires one to accept the premises that no further oil fields will ever be tapped anywhere, that advances in technology will never make extraction or refinement more efficient then they are today, that energy alternatives will never be found or switched to, and that current trends in population growth and economics will continue as they have for decades. Before oil, this country was dependent on coal and whale oil - when is the last time you used a coal stove or fired up that whale-oil lamp? On top of all that, focusing on the finite nature of one resource fails to address the true problem: over-population in a closed system where all of the resources are finite.


I don't entirely dismiss "peak oil" theorists. I find their arguments about minor disruptions in supply having inordinate effects on economies, due to those economies' critical dependence on oil, particularly compelling. I have no doubt that if we don't start seriously looking for energy alternatives (with an effort on the order the moon mission), their worst scenarios have a high probability of occurring. Yet, the supply numbers simply don't support the idea that we've already hit global peak production, so this theory's effect on oil pricing should be minimal. At least it would be in an open and free market, where the truth would come out before a rumor caused such a large rise in price.


Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Wheeler Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Dave is a freethinker currently living in Colorado. He promises to someday make his bio either more informative or more entertaining.
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Oil and Investment Banks: Wrecking economies with hedge funds

Marketing Torture

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend