Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 23 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Rising Risk of Systemic Financial Meltdown

By Chalmers Johnson & Nouriel Roubini  Posted by Richard Clark (about the submitter)       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   6 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Richard Clark

Why the US really has gone broke 

By Chalmers Johnson


Feb 4, 2008,


The economic disaster that is military Keynesianism


Global confidence in the US economy has reached zero, as was proved by last month’s stock market meltdown.  But there is an enormous anomaly in the US economy above and beyond the subprime mortgage crisis, the housing bubble and the prospect of recession: 60 years of misallocation of resources, and borrowings, to the establishment and maintenance of a military-industrial complex as the basis of the nation’s economic life.


The military adventurers in the Bush administration have much in common with the corporate leaders of the defunct energy company Enron.  Both groups thought that they were the “smartest guys in the room” — the title of Alex Gibney’s prize-winning film on what went wrong at Enron.  The neoconservatives in the White House and the Pentagon outsmarted themselves.  They failed even to address the problem of how to finance their schemes of imperialist wars and global domination.


As a result, going into 2008, the United States finds itself in the anomalous position of being unable to pay for its own elevated living standards or its wasteful, overly large military establishment.  Its government no longer even attempts to reduce the ruinous expenses of maintaining huge standing armies, replacing the equipment that seven years of wars have destroyed or worn out, or preparing for a war in outer space against unknown adversaries.  Instead, the Bush administration puts off these costs for future generations to pay or repudiate.  This fiscal irresponsibility has been disguised through many manipulative financial schemes (causing poorer countries to lend us unprecedented sums of money), but the time of reckoning is fast approaching.


There are three broad aspects to the US debt crisis.  First, in the current fiscal year (2008) we are spending insane amounts of money on “defense” projects that bear no relation to the national security of the US.  We are also keeping the income tax burdens on the richest segment of the population at strikingly low levels.


Second, we continue to believe that we can compensate for the accelerating erosion of our base and our loss of jobs to foreign countries through massive military expenditures — “military Keynesianism” (which I discuss in detail in my book Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic).  By that, I mean the mistaken belief that public policies focused on frequent wars, huge expenditures on weapons and munitions, and large standing armies can indefinitely sustain a wealthy capitalist economy.  The opposite is actually true.


Third, in our devotion to militarism (despite our limited resources), we are failing to invest in our social infrastructure and other requirements for the long-term health of the US.  These are what economists call opportunity costs, things not done because we spent our money on something else.  Our public education system has deteriorated alarmingly.  We have failed to provide health care to all our citizens and neglected our responsibilities as the world’s number one polluter.  Most important, we have lost our competitiveness as a manufacturer for civilian needs, an infinitely more efficient use of scarce resources than arms manufacturing.


Fiscal disaster


It is virtually impossible to overstate the profligacy of what our government spends on the military.  The Department of Defense’s planned expenditures for the fiscal year 2008 are larger than all other nations’ military budgets combined.  The supplementary budget to pay for the current wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, not part of the official defense budget, is itself larger than the combined military budgets of Russia and China.  Defense-related spending for fiscal 2008 will exceed $1 trillion for the first time in history.  The US has become the largest single seller of arms and munitions to other nations on Earth.  Leaving out President Bush’s two on-going wars, defense spending has doubled since the mid-1990s.  The defense budget for fiscal 2008 is the largest since the Second World War.


Before we try to break down and analyze this gargantuan sum, there is one important caveat.  Figures on defense spending are notoriously unreliable.  The numbers released by the Congressional Reference Service and the Congressional Budget Office do not agree with each other.  Robert Higgs, senior fellow for political economy at the Independent Institute, says: “A well-founded rule of thumb is to take the Pentagon’s (always well publicized) basic budget total and double it” (1).  Even a cursory reading of newspaper articles about the Department of Defense will turn up major differences in statistics about its expenses.  Some 30-40% of the defense budget is “black”,” meaning that these sections contain hidden expenditures for classified projects.  There is no possible way to know what they include or whether their total amounts are accurate.


There are many reasons for this budgetary sleight-of-hand — including a desire for secrecy on the part of the president, the secretary of defense, and the military-industrial complex — but the chief one is that members of Congress, who profit enormously from defense jobs and pork-barrel projects in their districts, have a political interest in supporting the Department of Defense.  In 1996, in an attempt to bring accounting standards within the executive branch closer to those of the civilian economy, Congress passed the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act.  It required all federal agencies to hire outside auditors to review their books and release the results to the public.  Neither the Department of Defense, nor the Department of Homeland Security, has ever complied.  Congress has complained, but not penalized either department for ignoring the law.  All numbers released by the Pentagon should be regarded as suspect.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Clark Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

New JFK assassination bombshells

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend