Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
General News

Ohio Report Faults Montana ES&S Op Scan Voting Machines

By       Message Press Release     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

Op-Ed/Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

JANUARY 6, 2008

CONTACT: SARA BUSEY, 406-549-4120

Ohio Report Faults Montana Voting Machines

Ohio has just done Montana voters a huge favor.

Last summer, Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner asked an independent review team of nationally accredited academic and corporate computer and election experts to test Ohio’s voting machines. Many are the same machines used in Montana to count our votes.

- Advertisement -

The results?

Released on December 14th, the $1.9 million EVEREST review found “critical security failures” in machines made by Election Systems and Software (ES&S). Forty-four of Montana’s fifty-six counties use one or more ES&S machines. M100 precinct counters are used in twenty-three Montana counties, the 650 central counters in eleven and the AutoMARK in all.

Researchers found the M100 optical scanners are “susceptible to attacks at the polling location that could affect election integrity,” and “an unauthorized individual could delete records of votes by zeroing out the vote totals.” The 650 central counter was, “successfully tampered to alter elections data in erratic ways and with obvious, but unpredictable results.” The AutoMARK’s sensitive inner machine was easily accessed by disassembling its cover.

(Read the report: http://www.sos.state.oh.us/sos/info/EVEREST.aspx)

A key finding of the review was that ES&S had “failed to adopt, implement and follow industry standard best practices in the development of the system.” Many of these weaknesses have been known for several years, yet continue to exist in ES&S systems.

- Advertisement -

The report recommended that ES&S adopt these best practices. “Applications themselves need to be hardened against known forms of attack, while the various other components should be configured to enforce the basic security rules of the best practices frameworks.” Anti-virus software, firewalls, complex passwords, and malicious programming alerts also need to be added.

Montana law [MCA13-17-103(2)] requires that state approved voting systems , “… be based on commonly accepted industry standards for readily available technologies.” The EVEREST report reveals that ES&S machines used in Montana are not.

Montana’s Secretary of State Mark Johnson claims, “Montana’s counties and the Secretary of State’s office take a long list of measures to ensure the integrity of our voting systems,” but those measures, although critically important, are not sufficient as long as the machines themselves are vulnerable to malicious tampering by the public or insiders that could change election results.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Idle No More-- The Indigenous People's Revolution Begins

"March Against Monsanto" Planned for Over 30 Countries

Bernie Sanders Blocks Bernanke Confirmation... With Bi-Partisan Support

Bush and Associates Found Guilty of Torture

Statement of 911 Widows In Response to 12/25 Terror Attempt

Family Farmers Amplify Legal Complaint Against Monsanto's GMOs