Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

What's Good for Boeing is Good for America

By       Message Michael Fury     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Remember this?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/04/09/wsad09.xml

Almost five years later this incident blurs into many like it in Iraq and Afghanistan. Something about the way an entire neighborhood was laid waste by four 2,000 lb bombs in a failed attempt to kill one man struck me as uncomfortably close to the US State Department definition of "terrorism".

Here's an account from the perspective of the pilot of the B-1B that executed this mission, the disarmingly named "Lt. Col. Swan":

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/030409-saddam-kill01.htm

The "fate of the butcher" was unknown, as were the fates of any unwitting human beings within a quarter mile of him.

"I didn't know who was there, and I really didn't care," Swan said. "The job was to go put the bombs on the target and worry about that later." Spoken like a true professional.

Well, "later" is finally here and Yankee ingenuity saves the day:

http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3761691&page=1

The claim that enthusiastic application of the "SDB" will result in less collective "collateral damage" in the coming years of occupation relies, of course, on the sort of optimism one learns to associate with professional "warfighters" like Col. Swan. As US ground forces in Iraq consolidate into the numerous permanent bases that have been built with billions of US tax dollars while Congress pretended to debate a "timetable for withdrawal", what this really means is more frequent use of air strikes--especially in urban areas--to enforce "stability". 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2007-10-21-airstrikes_N.htm

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/16/AR2008011604148_pf.html

And "stability" has been very, very good for "defense" contractors like Boeing:

http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/missiles/sdb/index.html

http://www.govexec.com/features/0807-15/0807-15s3s1.htm

http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/ticker/article.aspx?Feed=ACBJ&Date=20080130&ID=8114306&Symbol=US:BA

What was that President Eisenhower said on his way out of the White House? Some embarassing, paranoid rant about a "military industrial complex", wasn't it?

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://michaelfury.wordpress.com/
Igniter of brush-fires in the minds of men.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Meet the New Boss

What's Good for Boeing is Good for America

Open Letter to John Conyers