Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

Salt Lake County Mayor Corroon says upkeep of Electronic Voting Machines Costing "Millions and Millions"

By       Message Kathy Dopp     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 2946
According to an interview by KCPW,
http://www.kcpw.org/article/2366

Salt Lake County Utah's Mayor Peter Corroon says:

"The County budget for 2007 doesn't include money for more machines. Corroon says technical support and housing for existing machines has cost the county "millions and millions" of dollars already and he hopes the state and federal governments step up and help with the expense."

----------

Salt Lake Mayor Peter Corroon is the cousin of Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean.

Regardless of whether the county, state or feds pay for voting systems, the funds come from taxpayer pockets.

Salt Lake County's election administration costs could be reduced (almost in half) by switching to an optical scan paper ballot system to save money, reduce poll lines and increase voting system trustworthiness.

RE COSTS:

Utah's Lt. Governor Gary Herbert strong-armed Utah's counties into selecting an expensive, insecure voting system by withholding federal funds for any county which did not agree to purchase Diebold touch-screen voting systems. Herbert's office also had a secret executive session meeting with Emery County Commissioners and Diebold representatives after which the only County Clerk, Bruce Funk, who said he refused to use Diebold DRE voting machines, had the locks changed on his office door to prevent this 23 year elected veteran election official from going to work.

Here are some cost studies comparing the costs of using direct recording electronic (DRE) machines with optical scan machines:

North Carolina (4 counties)
http://www.ncvoter.net/affordable.html

New York (projected costs DRE vs. Optical Scan)
http://www.nyvv.org/doc/AcquisitionCostDREvOptScanNYS.pdf
http://www.nyvv.org/reports/ComparingAnnualCosts%20DREvPBOS.pdf

Florida Cost Comparison study (all counties)
http://www.nyvv.org/reports/FLcvcSurvey.pdf

Maryland Governor on Diebold touchscreen costs:
http://utahcountvotes.org/US/EhrlichLetter_20060215.pdf

Summary of cost comparison studies in FL, NY, CT, NC, and OH by Verified Voting
http://www.verifiedvotingfoundation.org/downloads/New%20vvpbcosts.pdf

A majority of U.S. jurisdictions use optical scan voting systems today. Several jurisdictions currently using touch-screen DREs are planning to switch to optical scan voting systems - including Cuyahoga County, OH, Sarasota County, FL and all of MD (often over the objections of their election officials who seem to be unduly influenced by voting machine vendor salespersons in an almost cultish fashion).

RE. SECURITY:

Last week, the NIST (national institute of standards and technology) stated:

"NIST does not know how to write testable requirements to make DREs secure, and NIST's recommendation ... is that the DRE in practical terms cannot be made secure."

http://vote.nist.gov/DraftWhitePaperOnSIinVVSG2007-20061120.pdf

Utah has an insecure, software dependent, and, for all practical purposes, "paperless" voting system because the Lt. Governor's manual audit procedure is not verifiable.

Utah's election officials refused to publicly release the actual DRE machine counts that were used to tabulate votes on the central tabulators, so Utahns do not know if the vote counts found in our manual paper audits match the electronic counts used in tabulating vote totals.

Utah's sham audit procedure merely compared two paper records that were found not to match the electronic records in 10% of the overall votes counted in Cuyahoga County, OH.

Utah voters do not know whether Diebold machines recorded and tallied votes correctly in either the June primary or the November general election. Diebold programming errors were found in three of Utah's counties so far. These ballot programming errors meant that some voters were given the wrong ballots and that poll opening was delayed in one county. Utah election officials have not yet investigated to see what the extent of the problem was in other counties.

It is time to start being rational about our voting systems - not throw good money after sunk costs.

-------------------------

http://utahcountvotes.org

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://ElectionArchive.org
Founder and President of US Count Votes, dba The National Election Data Archive and volunteer for honest, accurately counted elections since 2003. Masters degree in mathematics with emphasis on computer science. Has written numerous academic and (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact EditorContact Editor
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

MSM comes out against computerized voting, finally

Avoid Another HAVA Train Wreck: Software Disclosure Requirements

Who is Supporting and Who is Opposing Current Election Reform Legislation?

It Is Not Whether Or Not To Audit Elections, But HOW!

ES&S Opti-Scans Found Miscounting by 4% (8% margin-swing)

What do the Experts Say About Electronic Voting?