441 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 37 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Yet Another #People'sPlatform Has Usual Anti-People Problem

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment

David Swanson
Follow Me on Twitter     Message David Swanson
Become a Fan
  (138 fans)

Donald Trump uses backdrops formed by crowds of boy scouts or soldiers. Progressive Democrats use documents called #People'sPlatform endorsed by numerous quasi-grassroots organizations.

Neither remotely approaches the far more desirable governance that one would get using direct democracy, governance by opinion poll. The reason for the pretense of populism is clear: people are wiser, even laboring under today's relentless sewer of propaganda, than any contingent in either mega-party. There is little doubt we'd do better with representatives selected at random than with those we've elected.

The #People'sPlatform is a purely partisan document that asks only Democrats in Congress to do anything. And it asks them to do only what a significant number of them already want to at least pretend to want to do. Of course, as a minority, if they do all act as desired nothing whatsoever will happen.

To seem serious and practical, the #People'sPlatform pushes only agenda items for which there are already bills in Congress, but because the Senate is so relentlessly horrible, they are not items for which there is legislation in the Senate. The House bills promoted are good ones: single-payer (always a Democratic favorite when the Republicans are in the majority), college tuition, minimum wage, abortion, automatic voter registration, ending prison privatization, taxing financial transactions.

The bills do not go nearly far enough on college, wages, election rights, decarceration, or taxation. They are not what activists should be organizing around; they are what legislators should fall back on if they can't do better.

Then there is climate chaos, one of the twin monsters facing us, and the #People'sPlatform couldn't find a bill, so just hung up a "Coming Soon!" sign.

Then there is militarism, the other monster facing us, and the #People'sPlatform predictably takes no notice, never mentions the existence of 96% of humanity, never gives a nod to 54% -- soon possibly to be 59% -- of the spending Congress decides on each year. Of the several wars going, which would the "people" like to end? Who knows! Should the booming weapons trade continue to destroy distant places? I guess so.

On the topic of militarism, as it happens, there is no shortage of bills.

H.R. 1666 would end the U.S. war on Afghanistan. The bill has 13 cosponsors, 8 of them Democrats, but perhaps suffers the fatal flaw of having a Republican author. If the goal is to end the war, it's a great vehicle, but if the goal is a years-long election campaign for Democrats, it's deeply deficient.

Yet there are dozens of other bills to choose from. H.R. 2668 would scale back nuclear weaponry. And the cosponsors are all Democrats. What's wrong with that one?

Or how about H.R. 608 which would require the United States to stop arming terrorists in Syria, something Trump just claimed he was going to do anyway. Why not make it law?

Or draft an ideal bill and declare that it is "Coming Soon!" as done with climate chaos. And then impose that demand on Republicans and Democrats alike. That's what independent people would do if they got organized and had a platform.

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Supported 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

David Swanson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

David Swanson is the author of "When the World Outlawed War," "War Is A Lie" and "Daybreak: Undoing the Imperial Presidency and Forming a More Perfect Union." He blogs at http://davidswanson.org and http://warisacrime.org and works for the online (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Obama's Open Forum Opens Possibilities

Public Forum Planned on Vermont Proposal to Arrest Bush and Cheney

Feith Dares Obama to Enforce the Law

The Question of a Ukraine Agreement Is Not a Question

Did Bush Sr. Kill Kennedy and Frame Nixon?

Can You Hold These 12 Guns? Don't Shoot Any Palestinians. Wink. Wink.

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend