Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 11/20/16

Will Trumpolitics Erase Clintonism?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 73066
Message Pepe Escobar
Become a Fan
  (188 fans)

From Sputnik

Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump
(Image by justjared.com)
  Details   DMCA

The spectacular demise of the Clinton (cash) machine-captured, neoliberalcon Democratic Party, when faced to the Trump phenomenon, would necessarily entail a radical reorientation to appeal, once again, to its natural constituency -- US labor and progressive reformers.

Michael Hudson forcefully argues that's the only way out; "Are they to stand by and let the party be captured in Hillary's wake by Robert Rubin's Goldman Sachs-Citigroup gang that backed her and Obama?"

Hudson stresses that for Democrats, it's back to good old "it's the economy, stupid," or nothing. A delicious contradiction applies. "It's the economy, stupid" happened to be Bill Clinton's top winning mantra in the go-go 1990s. In 2016, Bill Clinton was ostensibly ignored by the Podesta-handicapped (via WikiLeaks) Clinton campaign.

On top of it, according to Hudson, reversing the neoliberal obsession entails "going back to Bill Clinton's pro-Wall Street administration" to finish the job. The only hope for the Democrats is "to do what Britain's Labor Party did by cleaning out Tony Blair's Thatcherites." A New York business/investment source with extensive connections inside the US establishment who called the election for Trump weeks before the fact proposes a radically different approach.

"Trump should meet with Bill Clinton to go over his ideas on how to sponsor innovation which drives the economy into new industries that made the Clinton presidency so successful. He left office with a 65% approval rating despite the Monica Lewinsky scandal. Bill told me he created the dot.com era on purpose to finance innovative ideas, and did not care if 98% of the new startups failed, as long as the remaining 2% drove the economy upward. It was so successful that Clinton left massive budget surpluses that Bush Junior destroyed in mad wars. Can you imagine spending three trillion dollars to find one man in Afghanistan or imaginary weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?"

And that brings us to Carroll Quigley; "Quigley was Bill Clinton's teacher, mentioned in his inaugural address. He wrote a very important work, The Evolution of Civilizations, on the importance of technological advances in pushing an economy forward. It is very boring but important. When I discussed it with Bill I had just read it but he knew it by heart. He said the book was the foundation of his entire political career. Bill said the key is figuring out how to drive innovation forward based on the institutional bias against change."

Bill Clinton would have no problems convincing Trump to stress the need for innovation to drive the US economy -- always taking into consideration that technological advance (as in robotics) do not necessarily create more jobs.

But another thing entirely would be for Bill to admit that Wall Street casino capitalism must be controlled; after all he opened the Pandora's box himself. The source recommends Trump to do exactly the opposite:

"The simple solution is to separate bank lending from all other activities, as Glass-Steagall mandated. Banks should not be trading in foreign exchange, derivatives, etc. Banks should make loans only to factories. The key is to force the Fed to only allow lending by banks for productive investment and not speculation. I would end all bank lending on margin. In addition, the SEC should be assigned the task of reviewing the use of cash settlement to manipulate the markets."

Call it a taller order than Trump Tower.

Now print those greenbacks

As much as 47% of Americans eligible to vote did not bother to on November 8. Trump had roughly 25.5% of the eligible electorate vote, in fact less than Hillary Clinton's 25.6%. That translates into a de facto mandate of roughly one-fourth of Americans. Overwhelmingly popular it is not. The key question is whether Trumponomics will be able to stare down and at least subdue the most savage aspects of unbridled neoliberalism.

Mike Davis, author of the seminal City of Quartz and Planet of Slums, argues that it is impossible to unify the economic distress of millenials with the angst of older white workers. He sees the solution not in "Trumpism," but in "democratic socialism" reigniting a New New Deal, a true "Economic Bill of Rights." Not a chance the Republican-dominated Capitol Hill will let Trump pull off a neo-FDR stunt.

Noam Chomsky is more pragmatic. He has registered how "the immediate reaction of the business world reveals that Big Pharma, Wall Street, the military industry, energy industries and other such wonderful institutions expect a very bright future."

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   Well Said 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Pepe Escobar Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: