Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 9 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Why Trump Won

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   No comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 6674
Message Robert Borosage
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)

From The Nation

The Obama coalition works only if Democrats don't throw white working people out of the boat.

Donald Trump accepts GOP nomination.
Donald Trump accepts GOP nomination.
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Fox News)
  Details   DMCA

"Sorry to keep you waiting. Complicated business. Complicated. Thank you very much." --Donald Trump's opening remarks in his victory speech

Complicated? Americans just elected to the presidency a candidate whom the vast majority don't like and consider dishonest, lacking the temperament and the experience to lead the country. They chose him even as broad majorities oppose his signature policies from building a wall to mass deportations to tax cuts for the rich and corporations. Complicated doesn't begin to describe it. Here are some commonsense reflections on this political tsunami.


Trump won with the endorsement of one major newspaper; his party establishment disavowed him, and many of its billionaires sat out the race; his campaign was out-spent and out-organized; his tax dodges were exposed; and a video documented his predatory sexist boasts reinforced by testimonies of several of his victims.

He won solely because of the choice: He promised change to a country desperate for it. Hillary Clinton personified the establishment, and campaigned on continuity. Trump trumpeted his independence and promised to clean out the swamp. Clinton was indelibly marked by the corruptions of our politics. Trump, the billionaire buffoon, presented himself as the quintessential outsider. Clinton, unable or unwilling to put forth a compelling vision of fundamental change, wrapped herself in Obama. For the 39 percent of voters who considered change the most important quality of a candidate, Trump led 83-14 percent in the CNN exit polling.


This was a class act. Clinton fared better among college graduates than Obama in 2012 and far worse among high-school grads or less. The populist temper of the times, reflected in the Sanders surge in the Democratic primaries and Trump's victory, is a revolt against political elites -- "Washington," "Wall Street" -- that have failed most Americans.

This isn't about gridlock. It is about the policies that have been supported by both parties -- global trade and tax deals of, by, and for the corporations, financialization and Wall Street bailouts, big-money politics and crony capitalism, decades of promises not kept.

In the "blue firewall" state of Michigan, half of all voters thought trade cost jobs. They voted Trump 57-36. One third thought it created jobs; they voted Clinton over two to one. The same was true in Ohio and Pennsylvania. This isn't simply about what Republicans obstructed. It is about what elites in both parties have done or accepted that corrupted our politics and rigged our economy.


Race, America's great divide, still matters. Van Jones called the vote a "whitelash." Trump's right-wing populism mobilized the people not just against corrupted elites but against corrupted elites who favored "those people." The modern-media master mobilized all the symbols -- the wall, Mexican rapists, law and order, guns and more. He ran a blatantly racist, sexist, misogynist, nativist campaign. Most Americans hated the campaign and disliked the man. Seventy-one percent didn't approve of his treatment of women. The poisoned chalice of populism has always been right-wing variants that play on anger against minorities or outsiders or women. Clinton played foil to the confidence man, talking about removing barriers, with constituency-specific agendas, rather than focusing on a populist economic message that would lift all.

Trump and the evangelical conservatives who rallied to Trump's transparently secular banner are likely to misinterpret this election. Americans did not vote to build the wall, deport millions, put gays back in the closet or women back in the kitchen. They do not support stripping African Americans of the right to vote or women of the right to choose. The majorities that twice elected Barack Hussein Obama have not disappeared.

This morning, many will awake rightfully terrified about the country they are in. Progressives must reach out to stand with people of color, women, immigrant communities, Muslims. We are headed into four years of fierce battles over reactionary policies and choices on immigration, on Supreme Court justices, on voting rights and more. But the answer to Trump's whitelash isn't to retreat on social liberalism; it is to double down on a real economics that speaks to working and poor people.


What happened to Obama's majority coalition? Turnout wasn't really the problem. Whites, 72 percent of the vote in 2012, were 70 percent in 2016. Blacks ticked down a point from 13 percent of voters to 12 percent; Hispanics ticked up from 10 to 11 percent. Young people 18 -- 29 remained 19 percent of voters. Single women remained 23 percent.

Clinton, however, fared marginally worse in each constituency than Obama in 2012. He won 96 percent of the black vote; she, 88 percent. He won 71 percent of Hispanics; she, only 65 percent. He won 60 percent of young voters; she, only 55 percent. He won 67 percent of unmarried women; she won 62 percent.

These are still remarkable margins among what will continue to be a rising majority share of the electorate. But 2016 should be a caution to Democrats. The Obama coalition works only if Democrats don't throw white working people out of the boat. Obama won majorities of those who were not college graduates; Clinton did not.

Republicans held the Senate, losing only one seat, and the House, losing only seven seats. They gained three more governorships, and now lead 33 to 14. Even as divided as they were in this election, at war with themselves, they are the majority party in the country, despite a reform majority still ready to be forged.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Borosage Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert L. Borosage is the president of the Institute for America's Future and co-director of its sister organization, the Campaign for America's Future. The organizations were launched by 100 prominent Americans to challenge the rightward drift (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Republicans in Congress Think You're an Idiot

Symbolic Blather: Washington's Congenital Disease

The Pentagon's Plan for Never-Ending War

Whose Side Are You On: The Moral Clarity of Occupy Wall Street

The Real Deal on Trump's Trade Tantrums

The Geniuses Who Brought You the Iraq War Are at It Again

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: