62 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 26 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 7/24/15

Why John Russell Houser isn't called a Thug and Terrorist

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message earl ofari hutchinson
Become a Fan
  (10 fans)

The two terms that were conspicuously missing in the reams of news clips, press reports, and news features to describe John Russell Houser, the alleged shooter in the near mass killing at a Lafayette, Louisiana movie theater, were "thug" and "terrorist." First let's look at what's known about Houser. He was a middle-aged white male. He had a Tea Party nation web page. click here was a registered Republican, He loved to call and rant on right wing talk shows against women, abortion, liberal Democrats, and anything else that smacked of a supposed liberal agenda. He had easy access to guns. And he was so mentally disturbed that his own family tried to have him put away. click here|htmlws-main-bb|dl1|sec1_lnk2&pLid=-999652294

This last point didn't cancel out the other known facts about Houser. But this made it even more likely that he would never be called one of the two terms that are exclusively reserved for young black males and Muslims. The issue of what's in a label and who gets automatically tagged with a label based solely not on their act but who commits the act crept into major debate after the riots in Baltimore in April following the death of Freddie Gray in police custody. The rioters, mostly young blacks, were instantly reviled with the usual appellations as thugs, hooligans, and gangsters. It didn't matter how many shots of the Baltimore rioters were transposed against scenes of young whites burning autos, battling police, and trashing stores following the loss of their home team in a sports championship game or series in several cities .The rioters were young whites, and it was the rare commentator who dared utter the word "thug" about them or their actions. click here|htmlws-main-bb|dl1|sec1_lnk2&pLid=-999652294

The issue of who gets called what following a violent outburst exploded into even greater national debate following the massacre at the Charleston AME Church in June. President Obama in his eulogy of Charleston AME minister, Clementa Pinckney, branded the massacre an act of terror. Yet, nearly all major media outlets, GOP leaders that commented on it, and the FBI, absolutely refused to brand the shooter, Dylann Roof, a terrorist or call his act an act of domestic terrorism. click here

The refusal to call Roof, and now Houser, a "thug" or "terrorist" is far from an arcane quibble over terms and definitions, or even the race and gender of the shooters. It strikes to the heart of how many Americans have been reflexively conditioned to see thuggery and terrorism. They see it through the narrow, warped prism of who commits the acts, rather than the horrific acts and their consequences. Take terrorism, FBI Director, James B. Comey, was blunt when pressed as to why he refused to brand Roof a terrorist, "Terrorism is an act done or threatened to in order to try to influence a public body or the citizenry, so it's more of a political act and then, again, based on what I know so far, I don't see it as a political act." click here But this begs the issue. In his so called manifesto, Roof by his own admission made it clear that his target was blacks and he targeted them to sow fear and terror and start a racial conflagration.

Houser did not just spout babble delusionary rants about being pursued by demons, goblins, and gargoyles. His rants were very deliberate and pointed at specific groups that he saw as threats to the right-wing's stock definition of the American way. No one knows why he chose to shoot up a theater. But when you combine his hate filled naming of groups, the easy access to guns, and whatever demons were in his head, the horrid consequence was a terror act as sure as if he had mapped out a bomb attack on a local Democratic Party headquarters.

The announcement that the Justice Department will prosecute Roof on federal hate crime charges doesn't fully render the debate over who gets labeled what a moot point. His alleged crime fits every definition of what a hate crime is in law and public policy. However, there's little doubt that if Roof had been Muslim and had shot up a Protestant church, he would have been branded a terrorist and the Justice Department would have been under relentless national pressure to bring terrorism charges against him. The act would have been a textbook legal fit of the FBI's definition of domestic terrorism which says it must be an act "dangerous to human life," and "to intimidate or coerce a civilian population." click here same definition could just as easily apply to Houser's acts. But he is dead and the state and federal charges against Roof are now set in concrete. In both cases, the narrative in the public's mind was set long before either wreaked havoc with their deadly acts. They are not thugs and terrorists. But are deeply disturbed, mentally challenged, drifters and loners, who if anything were in dire need of mental treatment and care, and a part of the blame for them not getting it is somehow hoisted on to society as its failing.

Government agencies, much of the media and the broad swatch of the public so far doggedly refuse to shed its ingrained mindset that terror and thug acts can only be committed by a foreign group, namely Muslim, and young blacks. This confuses, disarms, and puts even more Americans in harm's way from the nation's real home grown thugs and terrorists.

Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Earl Ofari Hutchinson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is a nationally acclaimed author and political analyst. He has authored ten books; his articles are published in newspapers and magazines nationally in the United States. Three of his books have been published in other (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Critical Race Theory Yet another Strawman Issue

The House is duty-bound to Bring Articles of Impeachment against Clarence Thomas

Think of the Two Decade Embarrassment of Thomas We Would Have Been Spared If We had known about Thomas's Porn Alleged Ob

Tea Party Now a Huge GOP Liability

The Awful Transformation of Bernie Sanders

Clarence Thomas Can Breathe a Sigh of Relief with Weiner Downfall

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend