Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment
General News

Who's watching the vote down South?

By the web  Posted by Joan Brunwasser (about the submitter)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -
 
 
FACING SOUTH A News and Politics Report
October 2, 2008 - Issue #149

Facing South is your source for in-depth coverage and fresh perspectives on the South, published by the Institute for Southern Studies. Visit here to join or donate; please go here if you'd like to unsubscribe.

- Advertisement -
  • INSTITUTE INDEX - Disenfranchised by design
  • DATELINE: THE SOUTH - Election & voting rights
  • BLOCK THE VOTE: Could disenfranchisement of student voters swing Virginia?

  • DATELINE: THE SOUTH - Election & voting rights

    WHY THE SOUTH'S POLITICAL CLOUT IS GROWING: Three key Southern states could be decisive in determining the outcome of the presidential race. Experts place Virginia, Florida and North Carolina among the top 10 "tipping point" states because of the close polls there -- and the potential payoff in Electoral College votes. (Facing South, 9/30/2008)

    DOES MISSISSIPPI BALLOT VIOLATE VOTING RIGHTS ACT?: The Mississippi Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case over whether state elections officials broke the law by putting the hotly contested U.S. Senate race at the bottom of the ballot -- a move that may violate the Voting Rights Act because of the potential to confuse voters. (Facing South, 9/17/2008)

    S.C. MAYOR "JUST CURIOUS" IF OBAMA IS ANTICHRIST: Fort Mill, S.C. Mayor Danny Funderburk claims he doesn't have anything against Sen. Barack Obama, but he forwarded a chain e-mail suggesting the Democratic presidential candidate is the biblical antichrist. (Facing South, 9/29/2008)

    DOJ WON'T STATION PROSECUTORS AT POLLS: Reversing a decades-long practice, the U.S. Department of Justice recently announced that it won't station criminal prosecutors at the polls on Election Day -- a big win for civil rights groups, which warned that prosecutors' presence could have a chilling effect on some voters. (Facing South, 9/24/2008)

    - Advertisement -

    WHILE MCCAIN AND OBAMA CHASE THE DREAM OF "CLEAN COAL," CARBON PILES UP AT A DANGEROUS RATE: Both major-party presidential candidates have been talking up "clean coal," even though most experts agree that large-scale carbon capturing and sequestering is at least a decade away. And unfortunately, we might not have that long, in light of new findings that carbon is building up in the atmosphere at a potentially calamitous rate. (Facing South, 9/26/2008)

    WHY ID-MATCH RULES LIKE FLORIDA'S COULD DISENFRANCHISE THOUSANDS OF VOTERS: A number of states including Florida will attempt to match the names in their newly centralized voter databases against Social Security numbers and other criteria -- and exclude would-be voters whose information doesn't match. Problem is, the databases are notoriously plagued with errors. (Facing South, 9/18/2008)

    ORGANIZERS STEP UP EFFORTS TO ADD EX-FELONS TO THE ROLLS: Millions of Americans have been disenfranchised by sometimes confusing laws denying the vote to ex-felons. But efforts are underway in a number of states -- among them Florida, Tennessee, Virginia and Mississippi -- to restore convicts' voting rights. (Facing South, 9/17/2008)


    BLOCK THE VOTE: Could disenfranchisement of student voters swing Virginia?

    by Chris Kromm

    [The following is part of the Institute's ongoing special coverage of voting rights and elections issues heading into November. Visit the Facing South blog for more in-depth reporting and analysis.]

    - Advertisement -

    Virginia has emerged as one of the tightest swing states in the 2008 presidential election. Every vote will count.

    The votes of young Virginians will be especially critical. According to the latest state statistics, 42% of Virginia's more than 284,100 new registrants are college-aged, between 17 and 25 years old. An astounding 50,000 new voters in Virginia are 18 years old.

    But new reports are showing that the rights of college students to vote in Virginia are still being challenged by election officials using an exceedingly narrow interpretation of state residency laws, potentially disenfranchising tens of thousands of young voters.

    How many Virginia voters could be affected? A 2006 report found 34% of Virginians aged 18-24 are enrolled in college. However, the share of young registered voters who are students is likely higher than that, given that voter participation rises with education and income, and because of the large voter registration campaigns targeting college campuses.

    If we can safely estimate that at least 50% of Virginia's new college-aged voters are students, that translates into over 59,000 college student voters. Right now, Pollster.com's averages show McCain and Obama separated by merely .2% -- about 9,500 votes. Using these ballpark estimates, that means affecting less than 20% of student registrations alone could swing the election.

    Those are just estimates. Whatever the actual numbers are, you get the point -- this is a big issue.

    WHAT'S THE PROBLEM?

    So what's going on? Local officials are being encouraged to use their own interpretation of Virginia law regarding student registration -- which has opened the door for some to use an exceptionally strict interpretation that could deny many students the vote.

    Students at Radford University, a state-funded liberal arts school in southwestern Virginia, recently organized to protest the actions of Radford city voter registrar Tracy Howard, who was automatically denying all registrations from students who listed a campus address as their residence:

    The RU Fair Voter Registration Alliance formed Sept. 15 after student Nikki Rampino registered using her dorm address and received a pending denial notice. After Rampino went to Howard's office and complained, her application was approved. She got her voter identification card Monday.
    But the Radford registrar says he will continue to reject student registrations with campus addresses:
    "If they give me only a dorm address," [Howard] said, "they will be sent something called a pending denial. It says that you need to have a street address, permanent address, in order to register to vote."
    The episode brought back memories of Virginia Tech, where earlier this year students were wrongfully told by a zealous Montgomery County registar that they could lose scholarship money and coverage under their parent's health insurance. Montgomery County later "clarified" their website.

    Last week, Sheri Iachetta -- the registrar for Charlottesville, Va. -- testified before the Committee on House Administration that Radford and Virginia Tech weren't the only places where this controversy was coming up in the state:

    "I have heard concerns from [other registrars] across the state that students are registering in dormitories," Iachetta said.
    Despite widespread public outcry, local officials are still interpreting Virginia law in a way that could bar many students from voting. On September 30, the ACLU called on Howard to stop issuing false denials to Radford students, and encouraged them to contact the ACLU if their registration was denied. Radford's dean of students, Trae Cotton, has announced his support of students' right to vote using a campus address.

    WHAT'S THE LAW?

    In his defense, Howard says that he wants the Virginia law clarified. That would be helpful -- but the reality is that Virginia law may not be as confusing as local officials are claiming.

    The State Board of Election's website is fairly clear, stating:

    A dorm or college address can be an acceptable residential address and does not disqualify you from voting.
    But it's not automatic. A student address only works if a student declares it as their formal "residence," a category that includes two factors, according to the Board of Elections.

    First, the student's address must be considered their "abode" -- the place where he or she stays (not a problem in this case). Second, the student's address must also be a "domicile." This is the source of the problem.

    What's a "domicile?" According to Virginia's election website:

    To establish "domicile", a person must live in a particular locality with the intent to remain there for an unlimited time.
    But how many students know exactly where they're going to be living three, four or more years from now? Virginia officials acknowledge that "intent" may change, stating:
    The applicant must determine and declare their residence and may change their intent at any time. [emphasis added]
    And how does one measure a student's "intent" anyway? Again, the state's website acknowledges that residency "intent" involves "an assortment of factors," and the state ultimately admits that "intent" is unknowable, at least in a legal sense:
    A person's domicile is essentially a matter of subjective intent known only to that person.
    Which, if you think about it, is true of any voter -- student or not. That's why several courts have held that to hold students to a different standard regarding their "intent" of residency would be a violation of the equal protection clause, as the Brennan Center noted in a 2006 brief:
    A few courts have held that a state may make an additional inquiry in a good faith attempt to determine residency, so long as it does not require students to meet a different standard from any other person seeking to register to vote. However, if the inquiry is designed to elicit irrelevant information that is unnecessary to assess fairly whether the student considers the college community to be her primary residence (e.g., where the student's car is registered), it creates a per se rule against residence in the college community, which violates the equal protection clause.
    Or as the registrar from Charlottesville, Sheri Iachetta, said before the U.S. House:
    "Determining a voter's intent [to stay in the state] is not our job to decide ... You don't want to create a special class of citizen, especially in a voting rights state ... Students are being categorized and segregated. They are young adults, it is their decision."
    Liberty University, the private Christian institution whose chancellor is conservative political activist Rev. Jerry Falwell, recently launched a massive voter registration campaign encouraging all 10,500 eligible students -- including those from out of state -- to register locally. It will be interesting to see whether that effort will be subjected to the same scrutiny.

    The Virginia ACLU has been closely following these issues and advocating on behalf of students. For more information, visit their website.


    INSTITUTE INDEX - Disenfranchised by design

    Estimated number of Americans who have currently or permanently lost their voting rights because of a felony conviction: 5.3 million

    Of those, number that are ex-offenders who have completed their sentences: 2.1 million

    Number of black men who are disenfranchised as a result of a felony conviction: 1.4 million

    Percentage of black men that represents: 13

    Number of times by which black men's disenfranchisement rate exceeds the national average: 7

    In states that disenfranchise ex-offenders, percent of black men who may permanently lose their right to vote: 40

    Number of states that permit even inmates to vote: 2*

    Number of states that deny voting rights to all convicted felons for life: 2**

    Number of Virginians permanently disenfranchised as of 2004 due to felony convictions: 377,000

    Of those disenfranchised Virginians, percent who are black: 55

    Number of nonviolent felons who've had their voting rights restored by Virginia's two recent Democratic governors: 5,990

    Number of Alabama inmates who filled out voter registration forms over the course of two days last month before the effort was halted by the Republican prison commissioner: 80

    Percent of South Carolina elections officials who answered incorrectly when surveyed last month about ex-felons' voting rights: 48

    Estimated number of ex-felons who were unable to vote in Florida during the 2004 election: 960,000

    George Bush's winning margin over John Kerry in Florida that year: 380,978

    * Maine and Vermont
    ** Kentucky and Virginia

    All sources on file with the Institute for Southern Studies; for more information, e-mail sue@southernstudies.org.

    Quick Links...

    Institute for Southern Studies

    Facing South blog

    Support investigative reporting and new Southern media -- make a tax-deductible donation today!



    Join our mailing list!



     
     

     

    - Advertisement -

    View Ratings | Rate It

    /* The Petition Site */
    The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

    Follow Me on Twitter

    Contact EditorContact Editor
    - Advertisement -

    Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

    Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

    Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

    Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

    Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

    Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

    Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers