OPINION: Who is really on trial -- Bradley Manning or America itself?
By James M. Branum
Chair of the Military Law Task Force of the National Lawyers Guild
February 22, 2012
Later, I learned that the Handbook and History class didn't tell the
whole story. America's history wasn't always so noble. We as a nation
have not always been on the side of "liberty and justice," and
sometimes our noble words have really been "bounced checks on the Bank of Justice" (to paraphrase Dr. King's famous "I Have a Dream" speech). But I believe that our collective failure to always live up to those ideals does not negate their value to the soul of our Union, always striving to be "more perfect."
These ideas have been pressing on my mind lately as I think of the
case of accused Wikileaks whistleblower PFC Bradley Manning.
After almost two years of delay, PFC Manning will likely be tried this
summer before a US Army court-martial. While the world watches how
this case unfolds, I think it will become clear that our nation is on
trial too. There are two charges pending : (1) through its gross
overreaction to real security threats, the US has forsaken any
semblance of democracy, and (2) The US government does not respect due process of law.
If we are a democracy, which requires informed citizens, why has
critical information about the wars in the Middle East been kept from
us? It should not have been necessary for a private first class in the
Army to allegedly leak this information in the first place. If
anything, we as a nation should be thanking PFC Manning for performing this important national service.
And are we really a nation that protects due process of law, when PFC
Manning's treatment has included:
1. Solitary confinement for 10 of the 19 months he has been in
confinement thus far,
2. Cruel and humiliating treatment during much of his confinement,
including periods when his clothing was taken away by prison
3. A preliminary (Article 32) hearing that was conducted by a biased
hearing officer, who was chosen by the same officials that chose to
bring charges against PFC Manning,
4. The denial of almost all of his request witnesses at that same
Article 32 hearing, and finally
5. A trial whose outcome will be determined by a jury panel composed
solely of high ranking members, who have been handpicked by the same officials who are PFC Manning's accusers.
It is not too late for the US to undo this injustice, by dismissing
all charges against Bradley Manning.
I urge all people of conscience to join the campaign to free Bradley Manning.