37 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 5/15/09

Who Cares What Nancy Pelosi Knew or When She Knew It?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   6 comments

It is difficult to understand what the Republicans think they have to gain by attacking Nancy Pelosi in the matter of her agreement or lack of it regarding torture.  In the unlikely circumstance that she was given a definitive briefing and that she warmly embraced and signed off on it, then shame on her.  In the more likely circumstance that she was briefed very selectively and, as she has declared, “misled” by the CIA and the Bush Administration, then shame on them.

But, unless we all have a fascination with the political skills or deficiencies of the current Speaker of the House, who cares?  In 2003 Pelozi was a member of the minority party in the shadow of the Bush administration’s heady popularity following 9/11.  She was not even the ranking member of the House Intelligence committee, and, like other politicians who are briefed on matters of national security, she agreed to stringent restraints of confidentiality.  Does anyone think that in that political environment any objections she raised to the policy would have changed anything?  

The Republican critics, piously led by Minority Leader Representative Boehner, are, as usual, making a pointless argument.  The most they can hope to achieve is the perception that Pelosi will be exposed as a politician whose public statements are parsed to put the best face possible on her motivations. Imagine that. Shocking. On the other hand, if it turns out that the administration and the CIA parsed their presentation, that does have significance, since they, in the locution of the ex-commander-in-chief, were the “deciders."

The only rational explanation for the Republican attack on Pelosi, abetted by a main stream media that parrots the party line, is the need to change the subject from a discussion of the immorality and illegality of the Bush administration to an irrelevant sideshow. Nobody argues that the decision to use torture as an interrogation technique was Nancy Pelosi’s, and the sooner we ask the who and when questions to the real decision makers, President Bush and the train of those subordinate to him, the sooner we’ll get answers that matter.

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Donald De Fano Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

I am a retired boatbuilder with a fascination for political thought. Most of my life I cheerfully described myself as an "eastern establishment, knee jerk, liberal Democrat."
Related Topic(s): Nancy, Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Capitalism and Health Care

Corporate America's Secret Weapon: Socialism

Follow the Money

The Occupation is the Message

A Pol Meets a Senator

A Case Study: Dawn E. Johnsen

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend