Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 6/3/22

What the Johnny Depp Verdict Really Means for Women's Rights

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   3 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message T. M. Elkins
Become a Fan

As a survivor of sexual abuse and an abusive relationship, I have found myself following the Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard trial with morbid interest. This fiasco of a scandal began six years ago, as the troubled relationship between the two broke down and Heard, appearing in public with a small bruise on her cheek, filed for a restraining order and divorce. Heard, bolstered by the sensational articles appearing at the time, positioned herself as a champion of women's rights as Depp's career crashed and burned.

It did not take long for controversy to stir on both sides. An audio tape of a strident fight between them surfaced, with Heard admitting to "hitting, but not punching" Johnny Depp. What had originally seemed a simple case of domestic abuse became the story of two out-of-control people, possibly both abusing one another.

Last year, Depp lost a huge trial against the Sun, a conservative British tabloid famed for its scurrilous headlines. Of course, this was seen as a victory for women everywhere, despite the mounting new evidence that Heard had punched Depp on several occasions, and even severed his finger. As the audio tapes and film clips of Amber Heard's deposions were made public, we could see Heard smirking and eating chocolates, as she described her altercations with Depp. At this point, as a victim of abuse myself, I really wondered how a woman who had been victimized could so nonchalantly describe being a victim.

As yet another trial began this, I tried to maintain a neutral view, giving each side the benefit of the doubt. Both sides seemed to speak some truth. Both seem to have had terrible drug and alcohol problems, with Johnny Depp being quite frank in admitting this.

As the trial progressed, we have seen the mainstream media unashamedly taking sides, propped up by the allies of Amber Heard (including multi-billionaire Elon Musk). Instead, the slack has been picked up by Tik-Tok and social media, with the most egregious lies of Amber Heard being turned into memes and YouTube videos in real time. This seems to be a complete breakdown of our press institutions, which have been co-opted by corporate interests. With the exception of NPR, almost all media outlets eschewed actual reporting in favor of virtue signaling and posturing, supposedly on behalf of "feminists". Despite this, hundreds of self-proclaimed feminists on Reddit, YouTube or Twitter spoke up for Johnny Depp.

To simply claim "believe all women" when the defendant so blatantly lied about hitting Depp on the stand, contradicted both her own story and that of her own sister, and flip-flopped on whether the op-ed was about Johnny Depp or not is both insulting to victims of domestic abuse as it is an insult to the concept of presumption of innocence.

We need to ask ourselves how the "me too" movement can possibly move forward if abusers and con artists are allowed to instrumentalize the movement and weaponize their gender. The question we must ask is whether women who hit men can be referred to as "victims of domestic abuse". We know that both Heard and Depp have had some serious drug and alcohol problems, and both have been diagnosed with mental health disorders. However, the mountain of evidence evincing Heard's abuse of Depp has largely been ignored. Do we take abuse of men seriously?

Sadly, the outcome of this trial will make it harder for women without evidence to claim abuse. Instead of clarity, a new polarity has been formed, and the movement itself has lost credibility. We can also expect, in the future, less trust in corporate media due to the lack of balanced journalism. The fault for this outcome lies squarely at the feet of Amber Heard.

Supported 1   Interesting 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

T. M. Elkins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Born in Camden, NJ, now living in Germany, T.M. Elkins is an educator, author, composer, jazz musician and singer, and founder of Christians against Bush. She eschews labels and "isms", is non-denominational and firmly believes in modern secular (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Don't Feed the Beast! Ending the cycle of consumerism, credit and crisis

The Hidden Psychology of Pandemics and Conspiracy Theories

US Economy- another great depression?

"Walls in Our Hearts" Music Video--Trump's Wall Inspires Comparisons to Berlin Wall

US Prison Industry Turns into "Gulag" Nightmare For Poor and Minorities

Pacifism and Eco-Feminism: Why we need a paradigm change in our culture

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend