Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 11/23/16

What is "Identity Politics" -- and What's Wrong with It?

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 38575
Message Thomas Farrell
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

Texas A&M International University
Copyrighted Image? DMCA

Education
Education
(Image by williambole.com)
  Details   DMCA

Duluth, Minnesota (OpEdNews) November 23, 2016: Before the election on November 8, 2016, political pundits (roughly the equivalent of weather forecasters) worked with red-and-blue maps of the United States to identify various red "paths" and various blue "paths" that each major political party's 2016 white presidential candidate might take to a possible victory in the Electoral College.

As you may have noticed, no political pundits are crowing today that they called the actual "path" that the Republican Party's 2016 presidential candidate, Donald J. Trump (born in 1946), took to his decisive Electoral College victory.

As I write, the Democratic Party's 2016 presidential candidate, former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton (born in 1947), holds a substantial lead in the popular vote in excess of two million votes.

Once again, we should note that no political pundit had forecast that Hillary would receive a substantial number of votes in the popular vote, but lose decisively in the Electoral College.

Nevertheless, we are probably not going to be relieved of political pundits making mistaken election forecasts, just as we are not likely to be relieved of weather forecasters.

After the election results were known, political pundits promptly pivoted to articulating post-election analyses. Even though it is hard to believe, many political pundits actually get paid real money, just as weather forecasters do.

In the mix of post-election punditry, I want to call attention to Mark Lilla's "The End of Identity Liberalism" (dated November 18, 2016) and Ross Douthat's "The Crisis for Liberalism" (dated November 19, 2016) -- both in the Sunday Review section of the Sunday print edition of the New York Times. So an editor may have orchestrated the match-up of the two pieces.

Mark Lilla (born in 1956) is a white political scientist at Columbia University. Ross Douthat (born in 1979) is a white Catholic convert and conservative columnist at the New York Times.

In the title of Lilla's piece and throughout his essay, he refers to "identity liberalism," which he characterizes as allegedly celebrating the differences of our diverse ethnic groups.

For his part, Douthat is a wee bit more explicit, characterizing "the concept of 'identity politics' as shorthand for a vision of political liberalism as a coalition of diverse -- gay and black and Asian and Hispanic and female and Jewish and Muslim and so on -- bound together by a common struggle against the creaking hegemony of white Christian America [also known as white Anglo-Saxon Protestant, or WASP for short, cultural dominance]."

So our two white male commentators have one thing in common -- they are commenting on a certain cultural and political trend that is not known for celebrating white male Anglo-Saxon Protestants or other white males, except possibly for certain white male feminists or other favored white males. (Disclosure: I am also a white male commentator.)

Historically in American culture, white Anglo-Saxon Protestants, and former Protestants, dominated the prestige culture down to, say, 1960, when the white male Roman Catholic Irish-American Harvard-educated Senator John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts narrowly defeated the white male Vice President Richard M. Nixon in the 1960 presidential election. Tragically, President Kennedy was assassinated on November 22, 1963.

No doubt the cultural and legislative victories of the black civil rights movement in the 1960s contributed to the white backlash that helped power Trump's Electoral College victory.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Thomas Farrell Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Thomas James Farrell is professor emeritus of writing studies at the University of Minnesota Duluth (UMD). He started teaching at UMD in Fall 1987, and he retired from UMD at the end of May 2009. He was born in 1944. He holds three degrees from Saint Louis University (SLU): B.A. in English, 1966; M.A.(T) in English 1968; Ph.D.in higher education, 1974. On May 16, 1969, the editors of the SLU student newspaper named him Man of the Year, an honor customarily conferred on an administrator or a faculty member, not on a graduate student -- nor on a woman up to that time. He is the proud author of the book (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Was the Indian Jesuit Anthony de Mello Murdered in the U.S. 25 Years Ago? (BOOK REVIEW)

Who Was Walter Ong, and Why Is His Thought Important Today?

More Americans Should Live Heroic Lives of Virtue (Review Essay)

Hillary Clinton Urges Us to Stand Up to Extremists in the U.S.

Martha Nussbaum on Why Democracy Needs the Humanities (Book Review)

Matthew Fox's Critique of the Roman Catholic Church

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: