25 online
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 43 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 4/7/12

War crimes in Libya and the March shift

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments, In Series: Attack on Libya
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

The March Shift 2012
The March Shift 2012
(Image by Michael Collins)
  Details   DMCA

Foreign Policy just published a roundup of weapons contributed to the Libyan rebels in the regime change effort.  The e-Journal is a publication of the Washington Post.  Colum Lynch's April 4 article relies on the March 20 UN report to the UN Security Council by a panel of experts appointed to track the UN resolutions and responses from the start of the conflict.

These two paragraphs, noncontroversial in establishment world, outline clear violations of Principle VI (a), (b), and (c), of the Nuremburg Principles, affirmed by the United Nations General Assembly.

"As the late Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi's forces prepared to crush the Libyan uprising last summer in Benghazi, Britain, France, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, and other allies moved quickly to reinforce the beleaguered rebel forces.

"With military supplies, training, advice -- and of course the backing of NATO war planes -- this coalition of governments provided critical support to change the course of the conflict, ultimately leading to Qaddafi's downfall. " Colum Lynch, Foreign Policy, March 4

It's right there. The rebels were getting their clock cleaned by the legal government of Libya.  The UN Security Council approved a humanitarian mission run by NATO to protect Libyan civilians based almost exclusively on evidence from one questionable source, an activist who was part of the Libyan rebels group.

NATO, Qatar, and the UAE supplied tons of cash and material, plus an air force, to the rebels.  Through Qatari troops on the ground, the NATO air force was able coordinate air strikes that, in effect, dragged the Libyan rebels across the finish line.  In that process, a sovereign nation was attacked without provocation.   Thousands were slaughtered, many more maimed, with incidents of ethnic cleansing documented.

Those acts violate the Nuremberg Principle VI:  (a)  Crimes against peace (i) and (ii) - "waging a war of aggression;" (b) War crimes - "wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity;" and (c) Crimes against humanity - "deportation and other inhuman acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds "

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

Principle III says "heads of states" can be held to account for these violations.  Send the NATO leaders involved to The Hague and let them sort it out.  If you do the crime, you do the time.

The excuse for war was the presumed bloodbath, a Rwanda!, that Gaddafi would inflict on the rebel cities.  NATO nations knew that this was not going to be the case, based on Gaddafi's behavior prior to the NATO attack.  Alan J. Kuperman debunked the myth of a humanitarian mission:

"But intervention did not prevent genocide, because no such bloodbath was in the offing. To the contrary, by emboldening rebellion, US interference has prolonged Libya's civil war and the resultant suffering of innocents.

"The best evidence that Khadafy did not plan genocide in Benghazi is that he did not perpetrate it in the other cities he had recaptured either fully or partially -- including Zawiya, Misurata, and Ajdabiya, which together have a population greater than Benghazi."  Alan J. Kuperan, False Pretenses for War in Libya? Boston Globe, March 14

The full UN report is and worthy of detailed review.  It documents the assault on Libya from the organization that authorized that assault.

The March shift

We're through with the years of indefinite delay from the end of a foreign war to the point at which the truth emerges.  It's not going to take three decades to find out what really went in at the latest Gulf of Tonkin (the outright lie that launched Vietnam).  The behavior of leaders, the greed of their Wall Street-big banker patrons, and a real unemployment rate of 22% are everyday realities for citizens.  Why should we greet any of the grand schemes presented without initial disbelief?

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

News 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend