Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Vote November 4: Defeat Suppression of Minorities, Youth, Workers

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Robert Weiner     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 7 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 13208
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)
- Advertisement -

From Arlington, Virginia Voter ID Information
Arlington, Virginia Voter ID Information
(image by Mrs. Gemstone)

The Michigan Chronicle

By Robert Weiner and Joseph Abay

Two riveting developments October 8 strike at the heart of Americans' right to vote and minorities' abilities to have fair power.

A report by the U.S. Government Accounting Office requested by five senators (Sanders, Leahy, Durbin, Schumer, Nelson) found that minority turnout was reduced 2-3% in states with ID laws--despite no ID fraud--because of the cost of procuring the ID's. Close elections were clearly at risk. GAO found that "the falloff was greatest among African Americans, young people, and newly registered voters."

Likewise on October 8th, The Supreme Court voted 7-2 (with dissents from Ginsburg and Sotomayor) overturning the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision that would have reinstated same day registration and students' out-of-precinct voting in North Carolina. This ruling has added North Carolina to the already long list of 22 other states with Republican governors and legislatures that have enacted voter restriction laws across the nation. These laws will take a massive toll unless the courts reverse them or the victimized rebel in large numbers and find a way to the polls.

Given the Supreme Court's attitude, there will not be time for the former before the November 4 Election Day clock ticks down--so standing in lines again to have voices heard -- which worked in 2012 and 2008 -- may again be the only answer to stop a right-wing takeover of the Senate and massive progressive losses in the House.

- Advertisement -

"Voter fraud" legislation curtailing voting when no fraud has occurred has become the staple of the Republican agenda. They were helped by the 2013 Shelby V. Holder decision. The conservatives on the Supreme Court gave a 5-4 decision against Attorney General Eric Holder, invalidating Section 4 of the Voting Right Act. The statute had mandated federal government 'preclearance' in regards to changes to state election laws. This legislation was essential in preventing African American disenfranchisement. George W. Bush-appointed Chief Justice John Roberts decreed that we now live in a 'post-discrimination' society, despite congress almost unanimously finding the opposite when it passed and amended the law.

Following the court's ruling, Republican governors and legislatures ran wild. 93 restrictive voting bills were introduced in 33 states; 22 states have passed them, and counting. On September 29th, House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer, the #2 House Democrat, contended that "Republicans around the

country are trying to make it more and more difficult for people to vote, because their premise, which is accurate in my opinion, is if everyone votes, Democrats win." Pennsylvania had passed a law in 2012, and Pennsylvania House Majority Leader Mike Turzai said: "Voter ID is going to allow Gov. Romney to win Pennsylvania--done." Not quite--the Pennsylvania courts overturned it. Iowa Secretary of State Matt Schultz openly admitted voter suppression is directly linked to giving conservatives more power over "abortion, gay marriage, and a whole lot of social issues we care deeply about."

- Advertisement -

Republicans present voter fraud as a pervasive problem, something that any fact-checking shows is not true. Between 2002 and 2012, out of a total of 600 million votes cast, only 10 cases of voter impersonation were reported. Any "fraud" has amounted to only 0.00000344666% of all votes cast. Why do Republicans love voter ID laws? They disproportionally affect African American voters, a critical Democratic Party voting bloc. African Americans account for 25% of Americans eligible to vote without Photo ID, while white voters account for only 8%.

Holder avowed that the Justice Department will combat voter suppression state legislation "that seeks to take advantage of the Supreme Court's (2013) ruling." Regrettably, his resignation on September 25 this year could prove disastrous for the federal lawsuits battling vote rigging "laws", if his successor is not as dedicated to the cause as Holder.

Michigan is not exempt from voter "fraud" legislation; a Republican-passed amendment requires ID at the polls, but voters can avoid the ID if they swear and sign an affidavit there affirming their identity. The Republican legislature also passed two bills to require photo ID's to pick up absentee ballots, cast an Election Day ballot and force citizens to sign paperwork affirming they are American citizens before getting a ballot. Even Republican Governor Rick Snyder considered the additional legislation "confusing" for voters (and knew it would backfire on him politically), resulting in him vetoing the latest bills. Republican legislators will attempt to push through voter "fraud" legislation in the future.

On October 9th, a U.S. Federal Court ruled against Texas, stating that the legislation created "an unconstitutional burden on the right to vote, has an impermissible discriminatory effect against Hispanics5 and African-Americans, and was imposed with an unconstitutional discriminatory purpose."

The ruling was a victory for the Justice Department, who had filed the lawsuit against Texas law because they considered it "stringent and burdensome" for requiring ID's to vote, and said it was "motivated by discriminatory intent" and "anti-immigrant rhetoric." Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez had called into question the law's disproportional effect on Latino voters, noting that "a Hispanic registered voter is at least 46.5 percent more likely than a non-Hispanic registered voter to lack this identification." The law also prevented college students from using their student ID at the polls. Texas did allow citizens to vote using their gun license -- obvious pandering to the right-wing NRA. Since this decision, the New Orleans Fifth Circuit of Appeals reversed the action, and it is now appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Ohio's Republican legislature eliminated early week voting known as Golden Week. The legislation also ended early voting two Sundays before the election, used heavily by minority voters and church turnout drives like "Souls for Polls." Following a September 29 court decision, voting on the last two Sundays before Election Day was eliminated and the early voting period reduced from 35 days to 28.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Robert Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS AND ISSUES STRATEGIST Bob Weiner, a national issues and public affairs strategist, has been spokesman for and directed the public affairs offices of White House Drug Czar and Four Star General Barry (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Do Conservatives Vote Against Their Own Interest?

Jeb Bush's Elephant in the Room: Role in Bush v. Gore Recount

Food Stamp Myth Busting

Iran: Nuclear Weapons or Peaceful Energy?

Why not free 4-year college?

All Athletes Should Face the Same Tough Drug Testing