Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News    H2'ed 3/22/19

Uh-oh, defense spending may rise again, and the Democratic leadership is on board

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   4 comments
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Don Smith
Become a Fan
  (23 fans)
- Advertisement -

Common Dreams is reporting that the Democrats in Congress appear ready to give into most of Donald Trump's request for a $750 billion defense budget. From Military Keynesianism is Back!': Democrats and Trump Agree on Pentagon Increase, Quibble on Details:

The Democrats proposed $733 billion budget would give the military most of what it wants in 2020, House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.) said in comments to the Federal News Network's Scott Maucione.

"The House Budget Committee, the number that they've talked about for defense is $733 billion," said Smith. "It's a not insubstantial number."

The Federal News Network's article, House Armed Services chairman says Democrats open to fairly big defense budget reports:

- Advertisement -

The White House's $750 billion defense budget is a nonstarter and stuffs too much money into emergency war accounts, according to top Democrats. But there is a way the Defense Department can get most of the funds it wants for 2020, said House Armed Services Committee Chairman Adam Smith (D-Wash.).

It's no secret that the 2020 White House budget, which slashed domestic spending and benefits while beefing up the military, would be dead on arrival for the Democratic-led House.

But Smith told the audience at the McAleese/Credit Suisse Defense Conference on Wednesday that it shouldn't be too hard to give the military most of what it wants for 2020 with a $733 billion defense budget that Democrats can get behind.

- Advertisement -

When I asked Rep. Smith (my member of Congress) about this, he told me that the above article is misleading, because in his speech to the conference, he was just reporting what he heard that the rest of the Democratic caucus appears poised to do. He himself thinks the budget is too high and has said so repeatedly. But he is one out of over 200 Democrats and can't make decisions himself.

The two articles linked above have quotes that document the apparent willingness of Democrats in Congress to raise military spending.

The Pentagon
The Pentagon
(Image by wiyre.com)
  Details   DMCA

Please contact your member of Congress and say: No to raising Pentagon spending! Ask them to sign on to Common Defense's pledge to rein in military spending, We can't afford it. We've spent trillions of dollars on corrupt, disastrous wars that have killed millions of people and thousands of Americans. The U.S. has about 800 military bases in 70 countries. Over half of federal discretionary spending goes to the Pentagon. Other federal agencies, such as the State Department, the EPA, and the IRS, are starved of funds and can't do their job. The Oversea Contingency Operations slush fund is used to bypass Congressional budget limits. See this resolution for more details and documentation on these matters.

The related article Veterans Demand Congress End the Forever Wars describes efforts underway by Common Defense and others to get Congress to reassert its Constitutional obligation to declare war and to put brakes on rampant militarism.

"When we look at the last 18 years, it has proved the Republicans are not going to lead us towards a more peaceful foreign policy," O'Brien said. "They are not going to give up defense spending."

- Advertisement -

Instead, Common Defense is focusing on mainstream Democrats, who could be leading the way for peace but have shirked antiwar stances for years out of a misguided fear of being labeled "foreign policy wimps." Democrats have also received tens of millions of dollars in contributions from defense contractors over the years, and even progressive Democrats are reluctant to oppose military spending that brings pork back to their home states.

Common Defense has been meeting with lawmakers and urging them to sign a "pledge to end the forever war" and halt the foreign policies keeping the U.S. military in a permanent state of international conflict. O'Brien is pitching the pledge as a litmus test for progressives, much like support for the Green New Deal and Medicare for All. Several progressive stars have already signed on, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rep. Ilhan Omar and presidential candidates Sen. Elizabeth Warren and Sen. Bernie Sanders.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Don Smith Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

DFA organizer, Democratic Precinct Committee Officer, writer, and programmer. My op-ed pieces have appeared in the Seattle Times, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, and elsewhere. See http://WALiberals.org and http://TruthSite.org for my writing, my (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The myth that the Dems are as bad as the Repugs

Why Abortion Isn't Murder

Why Dems should be furious at Obama

Image essay about blood soaked NRA

Government is like a computer's operating system: a response to libertarians

Failure to prosecute: why Obama is having trouble passing health care reform

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


Don Smith

Become a Fan
(Member since Feb 25, 2009), 23 fans, 135 articles, 575 quicklinks, 1721 comments, 45 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Oh, I made a mistake. I used "defense spending" in the title. A better name is "military spending."

I think few members of Congress are evil. But the system is evil, and the banality of evil results in an evil system that wages war and wastes money.

Submitted on Friday, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:56:14 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 44 fans, 70 articles, 3224 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Don Smith:   New Content

You throw around 'evil' with wild abandon.

Never forget . . . 'evil' spelled backwards is 'live'.

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:36:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

kappie

Become a Fan
Author 48333

(Member since May 6, 2010), 2 fans, 580 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to John Rachel:   New Content

unfortunately we will have nothing to live on if all our money goes to protecti ng corporations overseas.I would much rather see the Us protect us at home with decent retirement,an EPA and FDA that protects our lives form poisen air and food and water,good schools properly funded.

Submitted on Sunday, Mar 24, 2019 at 1:57:38 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Jun 2, 2011), 44 fans, 70 articles, 3224 comments, 2 diaries
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

The U.S. is at a crossroads. Actually it's in an epic battle for bragging rights. A budgetary clash of the titans. So far the DOD is winning. Congress allocates. The DOD spends it all. What kind of way is that to run a country?

The challenge is giving the DOD so much money they can't possibly spend it all. As a nation, we've been failing miserably. Somehow, the Pentagon manages to find new and inventive ways to plough through the allocations like a Beverly Hills hooker with a stolen credit card.

I say Congress and the White House need to up the ante. These generals are wusses at core, overachievers, the guys that never made first string on the football team. So let's step up the game. The squanderers will fold and collapse if we really apply the heat.

The fact that we're only talking 12 figures here is laughable. A mere $733,000,000,000? What a joke! Why aren't we well into the trillions? Come on. We print our own money. Let's go for it! There's no way the DOD could spend 12 trillion dollars. 15 trillion dollars. 100 trillion dollars.

Or is there?

Submitted on Saturday, Mar 23, 2019 at 2:35:17 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment