Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -
OpEdNews Op Eds

Ukraine Landlocked after Navy Joins Crimea

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 3863
Become a Fan
  (124 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on March 2, 2014 at 20:30)


RT Today Video
(Image by RT (Russia Today), March 2, 2014)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Why are we not surprised?   The United States neconservative initiated action in the Ukraine is backfiring.  The head of the Ukrainian Navy, Admiral Denis Berezovsky, just announced that the navy is now in the service of the Crimean Autonomous Republic. (RT Video)

"I, Berezovsky Denis, swear allegiance to the Crimean people and pledge to protect it, as required by the [army] regulations. I swear to take orders of Crimea and Sevastopol's Supreme Commander," Berezovsky said as seen in video footage.   All Navy troops dislocated in Sevastopol are ordered to disregard any commands coming from Ukraine's new self-proclaimed authorities," the PM also declared. "Do not take any orders of using arms till my personal instructions."  RT (Russia Today), Mar 2, 2014

- Advertisement -

With Crimea out of the question, there are only four regions of the Ukraine that offer access to the Black Sea, Odessa, Kherson, Zaporizhia, and Donet'z each more aligned with the Russian Federation than their parent country.  That leaves the new government of the Ukraine virtually landlocked.  It also raises questions about the remaining forces in the Ukraine military.

Will other forces mutiny?  Will other forces follow orders by the self-proclaimed government of the Ukraine?

When you give Russia the opportunity to act like Russia, it will do so based on its best interests.  On August 8, 2008, the colour revolution installed president of Georgia, Mikeil Saakashvili , decided to attack Russian troops in South Ossetia, a part of Georgia.  The Russians were there legally, according to previous agreements, but the president decided to flex his muscles.  He had "elite" Georgian troops attack.  The Russians responded, siezed a number of key installations, and humiliated the Georgian military.

- Advertisement -

"The Russian response to Georgia's attack on August 8 was predictable. They have a number of vital interests in the region. The provocation by the tiny Republic of Georgia was a gift. It created an opportunity to extend Russian influence in response to an attack on their peace keeping personnel. In retrospect, this outcome was probably guaranteed with the installation of an intemperate, rash leader who received nothing but praise as he replicated the policies and tactics of the corrupt regime that he helped remove from power."  Michael Collins, Sep 5, 2008

Ironically, the overwhelming Russian response was greatly enhanced by its naval presence in the Crimea.

Why would the provocations from the Ukraine work out differently?

END

Creative Commons 3.0

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy