Reprinted from www.corpwatch.org
Chinese factories in Dongguan and Guangzhou that supply UNIQLO - a
"fast fashion" label owned by Fast Retailing Co. from Japan - have been
accused of endangering their workers' lives, according to a new report
from Students and Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior (SACOM), a
Hong-Kong based labor rights group.
SACOM worked with Labor Action China (LAC) and Human Rights Now
(HRN), a Japanese non-profit, to conduct research on two UNIQLO
suppliers in 2014 - the Luen Thai factory in Dongguan and Pacific
Textiles factory in Guangzhou. The report revealed that excessive
working hours, low basic wages, unsafe working environments and harsh
punishments for workers were rampant in both factories.The activists say
that Fast Retailing needs to do a better job of supervising working
conditions in their factories.
"UNIQLO is an international brand, not just a Japanese brand. I
don't think UNIQLO can tolerate defects in its clothing," Alexandra Chan
Hiu-ching, project officer for SACOM, told the Associated Press. "I think UNIQLO should have high standards for its factory conditions as well."
The report is an indicator of an increasingly assertive labor movement in China. Over
1,000 strikes and protests were reported between June 2011 and the end
of 2013 in China, of which 40 percent were conducted by factory workers.
And in 2014, 40,000 workers in Yue Yuen shoe factories, the world's
largest shoes manufacturer for big brands like Adidas and Nike, went on strike to demand (successfully) that their employers in Shenzhen make pension payments required under the law.
Excessive Working Hours and Low Basic Wages
Pacific
Textiles supplies textiles to garment factories while Luen Thai makes
clothes for global apparel and accessory companies. Both are
headquartered in Hong Kong. The first company offers its workers a basic
monthly pay of RMB 1550 ($246) while the second offers RMB 1310 ($208)
which are the minimum wage levels for the cities they work in.
In
addition, workers are paid bonuses by the piece, so most put in as many
hours as they can in order to earn as much as possible, even though
they are not forced to.
Next Page 1 | 2 | 3
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
CorpWatch: Non-profit investigative research and journalism to expose
corporate malfeasance and to advocate for multinational corporate
accountability and transparency. We work to foster global justice,
independent media activism and democratic control over corporations.
We seek to expose multinational corporations that profit from war,
fraud, environmental, human rights and other abuses, and to provide
critical information to foster a more informed public and an effective
democracy.
Our guiding vision is to promote human, environmental, social and worker rights at the
local, national and global levels by making corporate practices more
transparent and holding corporations accountable for their actions.
As
independent investigative researchers and journalists, we provide critical information
to foster a more informed public and an effective democracy.
We believe the actions, decisions, and policies undertaken and
pursued by private corporations have very real impact on public life -
from individuals to communities around the world. Yet few mechanisms
currently exist to hold them accountable for those actions. As a result,
it falls to the public sphere to protect the public interest.
In many cases, corporate power and influence eclipses even the democratic
political
process itself as they exert disproportional influence on public policy
they deem detrimental to their narrow self-interests. In less developed
nations, they usurp authority altogether, often purchasing government
complicity for unfair practices at the expense of economic,
environmental, human, labor and social rights.
Yet despite the
very public impact of their actions and decisions, corporations remain
bound to be accountable solely to their own private financial
considerations and the interests of their shareholders. They have little
incentive, nor requirement, for public transparency regarding their
decisions and practices, let alone concrete accountability for their
ultimate impact.
1
1
1
