This piece was reprinted by OpEd News with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.
The Rupert Murdoch-owned Wall Street Journal surprisingly gave anti-war/pro-social justice presidential aspirant Tulsi Gabbard op-ed space on October 29 to express her views freely.
Since entering the race for the nation's highest office, establishment media shunned or demeaned her the only anti-war progressive running, her agenda polar opposite what both right wings of the US war party stand for.
Hillary smeared her by falsely suggesting she's a Russian asset "groom(ed) to be (a) third party candidate."
Last week, Gabbard said at a time when "our world is moving ever closer to a nuclear holocaust...when we may be sucked into another even more disastrous war in the Middle East, and tensions with other nuclear powers are escalating, and with that, a new arms race and Cold War that can only end in nuclear catastrophe, I believe I can best serve the people of Hawaii and our country as your president and commander-in-chief," adding:
"As president, I will immediately begin work to end the new Cold War and nuclear arms race, end our interventionist foreign policy of carrying out regime change wars, and redirect our precious resources towards serving the needs of the people here at home."
She is passing up a congressional reelection bid to focus entirely on seeking the nation's highest office stressing she wants to put "people ahead of profits -- people ahead of politics -- the well-being of our people and our planet above all else."
Her WSJ op-ed headlined: "I Can Defeat Trump and the Clinton Doctrine," saying:
"The US (on her watch) will stop trying to overthrow governments and police the world," adding:
"I'm running for president to undo Mrs. Clinton's failed legacy. From Iraq to Libya to Syria, her record is replete with foreign-policy catastrophes. It's a primary reason why I resigned as vice chairman of the Democratic National Committee in 2016."
Hillary notoriously was the most ruthlessly dangerous presidential aspirant in US history. She remains unaccountable for major war crimes, racketeering and perjury.
If elevated to president and commander-in-chief, endless US wars of aggression would follow, possibly nuclear war, risking destruction of planet earth and all its life forms.
She and her media press agents never forgave Gabbard for not endorsing her. As for accusations about being backed by Russia or other foreign powers, it's part of a propaganda smear campaign to demean and weaken her chances of gaining increased support she deserves.
Gabbard: "Those who are indebted to the war machine and the over-reaching intelligence agencies, as well as their cheerleaders in the media, are determined to take me down because they know they can't control me. I'm directly challenging their power."
US dark forces want presidents, key congressional members, and the courts supporting their self-serving agenda rigging things to assure anti-war/progressive candidates aren't elected or appointed to high office, wanting dirty business as usual left unchanged.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).
5
4
2
