Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus 1 Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Transcript: Katie Singer-- Electronic Silent Spring

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Rob Kall       (Page 1 of 4 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 12/8/14

Become a Fan
  (304 fans)

Katie Singer and her book, Electronic Silent Spring
(Image by Katie Singer)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -
br />

First half of the transcript of my interview with Katie Singer, author of Electronic Silent Spring.

Rob: Hi and welcome to the Rob Kall Bottom Up radio show WNJC 1360 AM out of Washington Township reaching Metro Phili and South Jersey. Sponsored by opednews.com. And go to opednews.com/podcasts and you'll find hundreds of other interviews of previous conversations that we've had on the show here.

- Advertisement -

My guest tonight is Katie Singer. Katie Singer works on public policy with the Electromagnetic Radiation Policy Institute. A medical journalist, her books include The Garden of Fertility; Honoring Our Cycles, and An Electronic Silent Spring: Facing the Dangers and Creating Safe Limits. Her websites include: Katiesinger.com and electronicsilentspring.com. Welcome to the show!

KS: Thank you so much for having me.

- Advertisement -

Rob: Well I really enjoyed the presentation that you gave a couple weeks ago at the Techno-Utopianism and the Fate of the Earth conference (ifg.org). So I invited you on the show to talk more about what you presented on, and on your book, An Electronic Silent Spring. It's an eye opener and full of great resources. So, I'm going to start off -- you started off your talk -- no you didn't start your talk, but somewhere you talk about how the early stages of the Earth's electronic activity contributed to formation of life. Can you talk a little bit about that and put that into context of the book?

KS: Sure. If we go back billions of years when some people would describe the earth, then, as primordial soup; and we had build up of charge; and with build-up of charge, lightning began to strike. And a bombardment of lightning storms led to the building blocks of life, such as nucleic and amino acids. Early plants made oxygen, which paved the way for animals. And what we know is that all living creatures function and are created by electrochemical signals. Our brains and hearts function by electrochemical signals. Even at rest, all cells have measurable voltage. So in other words, without electromagnetic energy, none of us would be here. We depend on electromagnetic energy for all of our functions, including digesting food and balance, and what makes my voice work with my brain. All of that stuff. And if I keep going with the frame that I've come to, I think 1844 is when the electromagnet got invented. And with that, rapidly came things like motors and radio frequency waves that allowed radio and TV. Electricity got delivered over power lines over long distances throughout the whole country to urban and rural areas. And all of that has happened really in the last 150 years. So the electromagnetic energy that we're now surrounded by at frequencies and amplitudes that do not exist in nature, this is new for living creatures, to be living in this, we could call it electric smog. We're living in a surround of electromagnetic energy that does not exist in nature. And how are we affected biologically? Like how do our cells respond to that man-made electromagnetic energy? How do our organs respond? How do wildlife respond? These are some questions that the scientists I report on in my book, they're looking at those kinds of questions. If I keep going. --

Rob: Keep going.

KS: Okay, so most of us got born assuming that we'd have electricity, we'd have refrigerators, we'd have television, radio, all of that stuff. And some people now got born assuming they'd have computers, cellphones, and WIFI. Along with those assumptions that we would have electronic devices, I think we've assumed that it's all safe. Again, some scientists are looking at that question: is that true? Is this stuff safe? This is one example that I find really helpful, although I don't understand exactly why some physicists are not thrilled with my analogy and I'll say that a lot of what I say is simple. When we simplify things like electricity, we can make errors. So, let me qualify that my descriptions are simple, and when they're more comprehensively described we get a better chance of accuracy. But here's one example that helps me understand why we've made this assumption that electronics are safe, and we don't need to question their biological effects.

If we -- we know that lightning and the electric chair, which both operate at high levels of electrical power, both lightning and the electric chair can harm and kill; we know this. We see immediate effects from them. What happens when we're exposed to lower levels of electrical energy? Some of the devices that emit lower levels of electrical energy would include radio, TV, cellphones, WIFI -- all that stuff. Usually we don't see immediate (biological) effects (from them), so we're basically enamored with all the cool things that the electronic device can do for us. We don't notice what's going on biologically. It may take a long time to notice, but what does happen say, if a child is exposed in utero, if she's exposed from birth through starting school? What happens to people who are exposed to multiple sources of electromagnetic energy like from WIFI, and cellphones, and smart utility meters, and you live near a cell tower? I could go on. There are lots of questions that we need to look at, and scientists actually have looked at them in many cases. We need to

Rob: Let me just interrupt with one thing. You just mentioned one item that I'm not totally familiar with, and I don't think listeners would be familiar. What do you mean by a smart electronic utility meter? The other things I know. Now that one I think you need to say what it is.

- Advertisement -

KS: Okay, many people have heard of smartphones and the "smart" grid as in the "smart" electric grid. Smart is a new catchy word. It's been around for a few years. If we're talking about "smart" meters, then -- and I put the word "smart" in quotes. A "smart" utility meter is a wireless digital transmitting utility meter. It can be used for gas, water, or electric. It can communicate data about your energy use to your utility company wirelessly. Some meters can transmit radiation for a half a mile or more. Depending on how they're programmed, they can send data every 15 seconds or once a month. They've been deployed around the country. There are many people like in California I think they've got more than 10,000 complaints to Pacific Gas and Electric, which is their largest utility company, about the health effects. We know, for example that people with cardiac pacemakers, their pacemakers can shut off after installation. What are the immediate effects? I have heard reports of a woman, whom I believe is an engineer, and she got into bed one night. There was a ligament in her leg that was kind of playing jump rope, every 20 seconds. Then her husband got into bed and he had the same experience. She had meters and they had just had a "smart" meter installed. And in fact, the "smart" meter was going off every 20 seconds sending data about their energy use to their utility company. So that would be an immediate effect. Usually we don't see immediate effects., Sometimes we do. People don't really know what's going on. They might not sleep well, they might have headaches. These are things now that people commonly expect to live with. So they might not notice a relationship. If you want more information about smart meters, my website, www.electronicsilentspring.com has intro packets. And one of them is focused on "smart" meters, and it will take you to other places that will give you a lot more information. I can say clearly that the goal of the "smart" grid is to reduce our energy use. For example, if people are using energy, using electricity in a smooth way, so in a consistent way, it's more efficient; we don't waste as much electricity. That's beneficial, because we all want to be saving energy here, saving electricity. But the smart grid does not have to be installed with wireless communications. Wireless communications actually use more energy. And they transmit electromagnetic radiation, which does affect us biologically.

Rob: So, these electronic utility meters, these "smart" meters are for the smart grid, you're saying?

KS: Yes, and they --

Rob: Are they also just for the convenience of the utilities so that they don't have to have meter readers come out like they used to?

KS: Yes. That would all be true. I mean, there are lots of reasons. I have, so in my state, we have an opt-out, for example, with our gas meter. An opt-out means, I do a self-read of my meter; I don't pay anything for this opt-out. It takes me about 8 seconds once a month. I go out, I read the meter, I write down what the meter says, and I send a postcard in to my utility company. Then I don't have to have the transmitting meter on my house.

Rob: Wow.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites, OpEdNews.com

more detailed bio: 

Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded Opednews.com-- which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet and the Psychopathy Defense and Optimization Project. 

(more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver